2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of alternating conditional expectation to predict methane sorption capacity on coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the discrepancies of results of experimental studies show that using the coal rank as the only factor evaluating the sorption capacity of coal is a controversial approach [9,19]. Additionally, the petrographic composition of coal [20][21][22], the porous structure [23], or the tectonic disturbances affecting the structural and textural features of the coal seam [24] disturb the clear picture of the relationships described in the literature. It is also known that various petrophysical parameters of coal may have different influences on the sorption properties of coal, and the impact of one of the parameters may limit the influence of another [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discrepancies of results of experimental studies show that using the coal rank as the only factor evaluating the sorption capacity of coal is a controversial approach [9,19]. Additionally, the petrographic composition of coal [20][21][22], the porous structure [23], or the tectonic disturbances affecting the structural and textural features of the coal seam [24] disturb the clear picture of the relationships described in the literature. It is also known that various petrophysical parameters of coal may have different influences on the sorption properties of coal, and the impact of one of the parameters may limit the influence of another [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further test the robustness of an estimation model, the normality and homoscedasticity of the estimation results should be analyzed in addition to performing the error evaluation [40]. In this study, the normality and homoscedasticity of the results were assessed by the T-test and F-test, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both average absolute error (AAE) and average absolute relative error (AARE) are used to estimate the accuracy of the calculated results, which are defined as (Feng et al, 2014;Fan et al, 2018b):…”
Section: Permeability Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%