Radial Permeability Measurements for Shale Using Variable Pressure Gradients

Abstract

Shale gas is becoming an important component of the global energy supply, with permeability a critical controlling factor for long‐term gas production. Obvious deviation may exist between helium permeability determined using small pressure gradient (SPG) methods and methane permeability obtained under actual field production with variable pressure gradients (VPG). In order to more accurately evaluate the matrix permeability of shale, a VPG method using real gas (rather than He) is established to render permeability measurements that are more representative of reservoir conditions and hence response. Dynamic methane production experiments were performed to measure permeability using the annular space in the shale cores. For each production stage, boundary pressure is maintained at a constant and the gas production with time is measured on the basis of volume change history in the measuring pump. A mathematical model explicitly accommodating gas desorption uses pseudo‐pressure and pseudo‐time to accommodate the effects of variations in pressure‐dependent PVT parameters. Analytical and semi‐analytical solutions to the model are obtained and discussed. These provide a convenient approach to estimate radial permeability in the core by nonlinear fitting to match the semi‐analytical solution with the recorded gas production data. Results indicate that the radial permeability of the shale determined using methane is in the range of 1×10−6 – 1×10−5 mD and decreases with a decrease in average pore pressure. This is contrary to the observed change in permeability estimated using helium. Bedding geometry has a significant influence on shale permeability with permeability in parallel bedding orientation larger than that in perpendicular bedding orientation. The superiority of the VPG method is confirmed by comparing permeability test results obtained from both VPG and SPG methods. Although several assumptions are used, the results obtained from the VPG method with reservoir gas are much closer to reality and may be directly used for actual gas production evaluation and prediction, through accommodating realistic pressure dependent impacts.

Calculation Model of Shale Reserves Considering the Adsorption Layer Based on Molecular Simulation

“…However, shale reservoirs have their own particularities. The porosity and permeability of shale are much lower than those of conventional reservoirs . The pore structure is complicated.…”

“…The porosity and permeability of shale are much lower than those of conventional reservoirs. 17 The pore structure is complicated. The specific surface area is large, and the gas flow in shale is complicated.…”

Molecular Simulation of Diffusion and Competitive Sorption of CH4 and CO2 in Shale Nanopores

“…1,2 A shale reservoir has low porosity and poor permeability. 3 It is necessary to perform reservoir stimulation to develop a shale reservoir, and hydraulic fracturing is a mature technology. 4,5 However, the injected fluid can easily cause clay expansion, resulting in reservoir damage.…”

“…A shale reservoir has low porosity and poor permeability . It is necessary to perform reservoir stimulation to develop a shale reservoir, and hydraulic fracturing is a mature technology. , However, the injected fluid can easily cause clay expansion, resulting in reservoir damage. , In addition, huge water consumption during hydraulic fracturing is undoubtedly a serious challenge for water shortage areas .…”

A novel CO2 sensitive and recyclable viscoelastic fluid system for fracturing

“…Since the 21st century, unconventional reservoir has become one of the most important fields of oil and gas exploration and development (Montgomery and Smith, 2010;Barati and Liang, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015a). A large amount of practical experience has shown that "hydraulic fracturing is an irreplaceable technology for the exploitation of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs", and it is also a key technology for economic and effective exploitation (Clark, 1949;Almuntasheri, 2014a;Fan et al, 2020). This is because hydraulic fracturing can provide a large number of fractures in the reservoir to serve as high-speed oil and gas seepage channels.…”