The Trust and Spatial Interaction of Social Nets

Сергеев, Виктор Михайлович; Кузьмин, Алексей Сергеевич; Нечаев, Владимир Дмитриевич; Alekseenkova, Elena

doi:10.17976/jpps/2007.02.01

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Таким образом, М. Кастельс приходит к выводу о формировании «сетевого общества», в котором все -от внешней политики до повседневной жизни -неотъемлемым образом включено в общее информационное пространство и оказывается предметом функционирования глобальных сетей 19 . Группа отечественных авторов идет дальше и указывают на формирование «сетевого фронтира», который формируется на стыке онлайн и оффлай пространств, при этом функционируя в виртуальной сфере и становясь каналами связи между различными социальными и политическими группами, сетями, а также финансовыми и информационными потоками, выполняя функцию распространения информации, труда и капитала в других сетях 20 Описание концепции политических сетей требует определения ключевого элемента понятийного аппарата -термина «политическая сеть». Стоит отметить, что кардинальных споров относительно определения данного термина, зачастую характерных для иных подходов, в данной концепции нет.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Policy Networks in Supranational Regulation Process

Savorskaya¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This monograph is dedicated to supranational regulation processes on European and international levels. It presents an overview of generalised characteristics of network interaction and also provides examples of networking in the fields of environmental protection and climate change, which are considered as one of the most pressing modern global problems, therefore demanding well-coordinated multilateral actions of actors at multiple levels. The main attention is paid to the EU experience. Публикации ИМЭМО РАН размещаются на сайте https://www.imemo.ru

show abstract

unclassified

“…Сморгунов определяет политическую сеть как «систему государственных и негосударственных 19 Ibid. 20 Подробнее о «сетевом фронтире» см. : Морозова Е.В., Мирошниченко И. В., Рябченко Н.А.…”

unclassified

Policy Networks in Supranational Regulation Process

Savorskaya¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Institutional Trust as an Economic Resource: Incentives and Obstacles of Efficiency

Martyanov¹,

Law²

2018

JIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Crisis of US-centric Globalization: Causes, Trends and Scenarios of Development

Казанцев¹,

Сергеев²

2020

Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditionally the processes of globalization and the issues of world politics related to hegemony are studied separately in the scientific literature. In this article the authors propose the synthesis of both of these approaches based on the model of transactional and innovative economy spatially structured as a system of “global gateways”. The globalization is conceived in the article as a process of reinforcement of network connections of different parts of the globe. The network is distributed unevenly around the world. The increase of globalization processes stimulates the strengthening of the network interactions and saturation of it with resources. The decline of the globalization we are witnessing at the moment results in the weakening of network relations. Spatial heterogeneity of globalization produces inequality in resource distribution on social as well as regional and country level. Due to this fact the system of global economy based on these gateways requires the stability of political institutes. In the 19th-20th centuries the system of maintenance of global stability (known in IR as hegemonic stability) was established. Increasing globalization provides the effective interaction between economic and political spheres. Declining globalization produces a gap between gateways’ demands for political stability and a hegemon’s ability to provide it. Recently the USA’s abilities as global hegemon have shrunk dramatically in relative terms as well as American electorate’s willingness to bear the costs of hegemony. Washington is unable to maintain stable functioning of “the rules of the game” neither separately, nor with its allies. This situation may be described as “the crisis of US-centric globalization”. The crisis of globalization relates to decline of international regimes, rise of uncertainty and conflicts on all levels of world politics. Presumably, it’s a long-term process. And at the end it may cause the establishment of new political form of economic globalization (e.g. transition to the model of hegemony of a group of superpowers, a scenario mostly close to generally accepted in Russia idea of multi-polar world), or emergence of a new hegemon (e.g. China).

show abstract

The Trust and Spatial Interaction of Social Nets

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Policy Networks in Supranational Regulation Process

Policy Networks in Supranational Regulation Process

The Institutional Trust as an Economic Resource: Incentives and Obstacles of Efficiency

The Crisis of US-centric Globalization: Causes, Trends and Scenarios of Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About