The Transmission of Elite Positions among the Dutch Nobility during the 20th Century

Schijf, H.; Dronkers, Jaap

doi:10.7788/boehlau.9783412331504.65

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We use involvement of members of the aristocracy in the governance of corporations as a measurement of an old boys' network. 2 Within Dutch aristocracy, there was a tendency to endogamy, a strong feeling of we-ness, and an awareness of social and political responsibility (noblesse oblige) (Bruin, 1987;Dronkers, 2000;Dronkers and Schijf, 2004;van den Berge and Fennema, 1985). This is not to say that aristocracy always acted in the best interests of society as a whole, but they did feel an intrinsic quasi-feudal responsibility towards society.…”

Section: The Traditional Old Boys' Network In the Netherlandsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite

Heemskerk

Fennema

2009

International Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates the cohesion of the Dutch business elite during the 20th century. First it considers the old boys' network, where social cohesion builds on shared family and educational background. Second, the board-meeting network of corporate directors in the Netherlands is analysed as an expression of the cohesion of the corporate elite. Unlike most studies on interlocking directorates, this article focuses on the interpersonal perspective of the network instead of the intercorporate perspective. The study finds that social cohesion declined between 1976 and 2001. The meeting network of the Dutch corporate elite has become the realm of brokers rather than a device of social cohesion and social closure. It no longer serves the purpose of creating trust among the corporate elite. As a result, norms of corporate governance have become blurred. keywords: corporate elite ! corporate governance ! interlocking directorates ! the Netherlands ! network analysis ! networks A shift has taken place within the corporate elite, from oligarchy to democracy. (Carroll, 2004)

show abstract

Section: The Traditional Old Boys' Network In the Netherlandsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite

Heemskerk

Fennema

2009

International Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tabel 6 toont dat dit 'goed huwelijk'-effect alleen waar is voor zonen. (Dronkers, 2000, Dronkers & Schijf, 2002 dat de kans om een elitepositie te bereiken voor de adel in Nederland nauwelijks is verminderd gedurende de twintigste eeuw. Nog algemener geformuleerd, de uitkomsten van dit artikel bevestigen opnieuw de conclusies van ander onderzoek (zie paragraaf 2) dat een adellijke titel nog steeds voordeel oplevert bij het verwerven van een elitepositie in Nederland, ook in vergelijking met het patriciaat.…”

Section: Brede En Smalle Eliteposities Verklaardunclassified

Nederlandse elites in de twintigste eeuw : Continuïteit en verandering

Fennema¹,

Schijf²

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever.Voorzover het maken van kopieën uit deze uitgave is toegestaan op grond van artikel 16B Auteurswet

show abstract

“…Then in another study, it was stated that the Dutch aristocratic family had held a more elite position than the bourgeois family until the 20th century, this relative advantage had barely changed for several generations, the descendants of the nobility even turned into elites in the public sector. (Dronkers & Schijf, 2001). Another study explains that the dominance of individuals or elite groups in a party is exacerbated by the centralization of the organizational structure that has become a characteristic of parties in Indonesia in general.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Political Dominance of the Nobles in the Golkar Party of Bone Regency

Putra,

Hartaman

2022

jclp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research was to find out how the political dominance of the noble descendants in the Golkar party of Bone Regency. The research method used is qualitative with several research indicators processed through nvivo12 plus application. The results showed that the political dominance of noble descendants (Andi) on the Golkar party body has been going on for a long time, the existence of noble descendants is seen in the Chairman of DPD II Golkar Bone Regency occupied by noble descendants since 1971 - 2024. The dominance was born because the descendants of nobles had the good capacity and popularity in political contestation. Golkar party in cadre recruitment is open to all circles and does not distinguish from social strata, in the era of democracy there are no more restrictions to process in political parties. So actually there is no requirement to have a noble title to enter the party

show abstract

The Transmission of Elite Positions among the Dutch Nobility during the 20th Century

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite

Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite

Nederlandse elites in de twintigste eeuw : Continuïteit en verandering

Political Dominance of the Nobles in the Golkar Party of Bone Regency

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About