2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The thalamic connections of motor, premotor, and prefrontal areas of cortex in a prosimian primate (Otolemur garnetti)

Abstract: Connections of motor areas in the frontal cortex of prosimian galagos (Otolemur garnetti) were determined by injecting tracers into sites identified by microstimulation in the primary motor area (M1), dorsal premotor area (PMD), ventral premotor area (PMV), supplementary motor area (SMA), frontal eye field (FEF), and granular frontal cortex. Retrogradely labeled neurons for each injection were related to architectonically defined thalamic nuclei. Nissl, acetylcholinesterase, cytochrome oxidase, myelin, parvalb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and have different patterns of interconnection with the neocortex. Thus, VLp (VPLo) has dense projections to motor and premotor areas and to area 3a (see Wiesendanger and Miles 1982; Macchi and Jones 1997; see Fang et al 2006 for review) while VPs has major projections to areas 2 and 5 (Pons and Kaas 1985b). For these reasons, it is more consistent with other nomenclature to refer to VPs and VLp as separate nuclei rather than as a shell of VP proper (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) and have different patterns of interconnection with the neocortex. Thus, VLp (VPLo) has dense projections to motor and premotor areas and to area 3a (see Wiesendanger and Miles 1982; Macchi and Jones 1997; see Fang et al 2006 for review) while VPs has major projections to areas 2 and 5 (Pons and Kaas 1985b). For these reasons, it is more consistent with other nomenclature to refer to VPs and VLp as separate nuclei rather than as a shell of VP proper (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral parvocellular portion of the MD (MDpc) has a completely different pattern of connectivity. Indeed, it is reciprocally connected to the dorsolateral regions of the frontal lobes (DLPFC) (Preuss and Goldman-Rakic, 1987;Fang et al, 2006;Ray and Price, 1993) and thus may influence the role played by the frontal lobes in memory (and when damaged presumably it presumably reflects the dysfunctional memory pattern observed following prefrontal damage). Indeed, the second assumption is that the DLPFC is particularly implicated in promoting relational memory (Blumenfeld et al, 2011;Mitchell and Johnson, 2009).…”
Section: Patients With Damage To the MD Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, damage to the cellular component of the VA proper and the anterior portions of the VLa and VLp may lead to dysfunction of the lateral frontal cortices. These nuclei have abundant connections with the lateral frontal cortices (Fang, Stepniewska, & Kaas, 2006;Jones, 2007). …”
Section: Thalamo-cortical Network For Language/semantic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%