1995
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Television, School, and Family Smoking Prevention and Cessation Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The few studies of the impact of these campaigns on youth smoking had mixed results. Community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a mass media campaign reduced smoking initiation rates among adolescents in Vermont, New York, and Montana, [21][22][23][24][25] Minnesota, 26 North Karelia, 27 and Norway, 28 but they failed to influence smoking behavior among youths in southern California 29 or the southeastern United States. 30 Existing studies have evaluated the results of research demonstration projects; it is not clear whether similar results could be expected from government-funded statewide media campaigns, which tend to target more homogeneous populations, provide less control over individual exposure, and introduce political factors that influence a program's effectiveness.…”
Section: Michael Siegel MD Mph and Lois Biener Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The few studies of the impact of these campaigns on youth smoking had mixed results. Community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a mass media campaign reduced smoking initiation rates among adolescents in Vermont, New York, and Montana, [21][22][23][24][25] Minnesota, 26 North Karelia, 27 and Norway, 28 but they failed to influence smoking behavior among youths in southern California 29 or the southeastern United States. 30 Existing studies have evaluated the results of research demonstration projects; it is not clear whether similar results could be expected from government-funded statewide media campaigns, which tend to target more homogeneous populations, provide less control over individual exposure, and introduce political factors that influence a program's effectiveness.…”
Section: Michael Siegel MD Mph and Lois Biener Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second generation of prevention efforts sought to use this information to design programmes to address these predictors of specific problem behaviours, which was more successful. 8,9 These prevention interventions focusing on single problems came under criticism, and there was a movement towards considering the co-occurrence of problem behaviours within the adolescent and understanding the overlap in predictors across many behaviours. 10 Others-ie, prevention practitioners, policy makers, and prevention scientists-advocated for more focus on factors that promote positive youth development, in addition to the focus on reducing factors that predict problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flay and colleagues 133 found that at 2-year follow-up, there was no significant change in smoking behavior, intentions to quit, or refusal self-efficacy but that there were significant maintenance of knowledge differences.…”
Section: Smoking Cessation With Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another pilot study 133 compared treatments of television intervention, school intervention, com-bined television and school, and no treatment control group. Flay and colleagues 133 found that at 2-year follow-up, there was no significant change in smoking behavior, intentions to quit, or refusal self-efficacy but that there were significant maintenance of knowledge differences.…”
Section: Smoking Cessation With Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%