2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:popu.0000020882.29684.8e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Surprising Global Variation in Replacement Fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second population scenario (Pop_NS) the population size was assumed to follow the nonsteady state UN Medium Population Growth Scenario (UN 2004). This second scenario allows for a general decreasing population size as the current trends in population dynamics show fertility rates below the 2.1 child per fertile woman needed to provide a steady state (Espenshade et al 2003).…”
Section: Population and Consumption Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second population scenario (Pop_NS) the population size was assumed to follow the nonsteady state UN Medium Population Growth Scenario (UN 2004). This second scenario allows for a general decreasing population size as the current trends in population dynamics show fertility rates below the 2.1 child per fertile woman needed to provide a steady state (Espenshade et al 2003).…”
Section: Population and Consumption Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most contemporary developed countries, mortality below age 50 is now very low, and thus the replacement level of fertility is slightly above 2 births per woman (i.e., usually taken as 2.1) (see Espenshade et al 2003). Contemporary concerns about low fertility have resulted from period fertility rates well below this level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current population studies show that this is not the case. It is generally estimated that an aggregate fertility rate of between at 2.05 and 2.1 is necessary to keep the global population stable over time [2,18] Therefore the objection would apply only in the case of those particular jurisdictions whose aim is to decrease population numbers for autochthonous reasons. However, in that case the objection must show on independent grounds that instituting a selective national population reduction policy without imposing the same policy on other countries is ethically defensible.…”
Section: Some Possible Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%