2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1564-913x.2008.00029.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of worker protections in the United States: Unregulated work in New York City

Abstract: Abstract. Using original data gathered in 2003–06, the authors examine the prevalence and types of non‐compliance with labour law in New York City. Workplace violations — or “unregulated work”— are widespread across a range of low‐wage industries and have been driven by a mix of economic factors as well as public policy. The solution, the authors argue, is to strengthen law enforcement and provide for the new types of employment relationship that have resulted from changes in the organization of work and produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexibility and some opportunism in methodology is an established approach in fieldwork of this kind and our empirical focus required that we adopt similar techniques (for a discussion of methodological issues, see Bernhardt et al, 2008). We began by 'mapping' the location of car wash sites within the city boundaries, using direct observation supported by content analysis of business directories, internet and social media sites.…”
Section: Research Methods and Emerging Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flexibility and some opportunism in methodology is an established approach in fieldwork of this kind and our empirical focus required that we adopt similar techniques (for a discussion of methodological issues, see Bernhardt et al, 2008). We began by 'mapping' the location of car wash sites within the city boundaries, using direct observation supported by content analysis of business directories, internet and social media sites.…”
Section: Research Methods and Emerging Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA many workers who are forced to accept informal employment feel unable to seek recourse to regulatory agencies. Indeed, the absence of regulatory recourse is so extensive in nail bars, HCWs and restaurants that in New York City violations of employment and labour laws constitute the dominant business strategy, putting pressure on responsible employers to follow suit in order to compete (Bernhardt et al, 2008). The lessons for this study from the American literature are that in the presence of a sector dominated by informalization employers are effectively insulated from regulatory compliance because worker grievances are unlikely to be mobilized into activism in the absence of a countermovement which operates beyond collective bargaining.…”
Section: The Context Growth and Diffusion Of The Hcw Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depends on the willingness of the state to enforce the labor laws. Unfortunately, the Israeli government-similarly to the UK and the U.S. governments (Bernhardt, McGrath, & DeFilippis, 2008;Robinson, Dryden, & Gomez-Duplantis, 2010)-does not enforce the labor laws very srictly (Shamir, 2013). According to Kaufka (2003), one of the main reasons for underenforcement of workers' laws is that the home care work is perceived by governments worldwide as part of the private sphere.…”
Section: The Israeli Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Complaint-based enforcement had long been the dominant approach taken by the federal government, but by 2015, directed enforcement accounted for a remarkable 45 percent of investigations -an unprecedented percentage in WHD's history (DOL 2017). Yet, while state enforcement is essential, government does not have enough investigators to monitor all employer sites, nor is it likely to ever have an adequate number (Wial 1999;Bernhardt, McGrath, and DeFillipis 2008). Additionally, government is unlikely to have as much information about conditions on the ground as workers in the workplace, and it generally lacks the relationships with vulnerable workers that strong organizations can build.…”
Section: Labor Standards and The Corrective Of Co-enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%