2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00304.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Smithsonian–nist Partnership: The Application of Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis to Archaeology

Abstract: The history and procedures of the Smithsonian-NIST programme in the application of instrumental neutron activation to the study of archaeological materials are reviewed. Statistical processing of the resulting analytical data is a major focus of the programme, with attention called to processes of initial group formation. Specific areas of current research emphasis are presented, which build upon the strength of accumulated databases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical analysis of the vessel pastes was carried out by Bishop using the Smithsonian Institution's INAA facility at the National Institute for Standards and Technology following routine protocols (see Blackman and Bishop, 2007) Several paste groups can be defined using the chemical characteristics of ceramic pastes within an initial 1400 sample set assembled for the greater Motul de San José and Tikal regions. Analysis was guided by the interest in seeing if there was evidence for similarity of grouping behavior for the ceramic pastes that might covary with the patterns observed for their paint samples.…”
Section: Polychromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analysis of the vessel pastes was carried out by Bishop using the Smithsonian Institution's INAA facility at the National Institute for Standards and Technology following routine protocols (see Blackman and Bishop, 2007) Several paste groups can be defined using the chemical characteristics of ceramic pastes within an initial 1400 sample set assembled for the greater Motul de San José and Tikal regions. Analysis was guided by the interest in seeing if there was evidence for similarity of grouping behavior for the ceramic pastes that might covary with the patterns observed for their paint samples.…”
Section: Polychromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies involving the trade and exchange of Mesoamerican pottery have been major benefactors of data obtained by chemical analysis of ceramic materials. Among the techniques applied to determine the movement of pottery is atomic absorption (Torres et al 1984), X-ray fluorescence (Pool 1990), and neutron activation, using both delayed and prompt gammas (see reviews by Blackman and Bishop 2007; Glascock et al 2007; Harbottle and Holmes 2007). Other techniques such as scanning electron microcopy, X-ray diffraction (Domínguez et al 2002; Tenorio et al 2005), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Iñañez et al 2010) have provided useful information about the clays or other mineralogical components of a ceramic matrix, as well as technological data for slips, pigments, glazes, (see, for example, Backes et al 2012; Cecil 2001, 2004; Neff 2003; Speakman et al 2002).…”
Section: Sources Of Ideosyncracy: the Analyst And The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present a small study aimed at evaluating the potential for contamination during the process of sample‐powder extraction. Several methods have been advocated by different archaeometry programmes during the past 30 years (Asaro and Adan‐Bayewitz 2007; Blackman and Bishop 2007; Harbottle and Holmes 2007; Hughes 2007), and most laboratories develop a standardized protocol so as to minimize confounding effects of contamination. The Archaeometry Laboratory at the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) routinely employs a method by which a small fragment is broken from the ceramic artefact, all surfaces are burred from the broken piece using a silicon‐carbide (SC) abrasive grinding stone, and the remaining fragment is ground in an agate mortar and pestle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%