2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00706.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of Sample‐extraction Methods and the Potential for Contamination in Ceramic Specimens*

Abstract: Contamination of ceramic specimens resulting from sample‐preparation techniques has the ability to confound efforts of chemical characterization. Primary contamination, identified by significant concentrations of one or more elements, is easily identified. Secondary contamination, resulting from undetected elements influencing detected elements, is more difficult to identify. Evaluation of six powder‐extraction techniques identifies variable effects of contamination. Extraction by drilling carries the highest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the tungsten carbide cell used to mill the ceramics was a potential contaminator, Co and Ta were removed from the statistical procedure. The reason is that Co is a known binder of tungsten alloys and usually occurs along with Ta traces [43]. Furthermore, Sn, Ni, Cu and Zn were also removed, the first because it showed values under the quantification limit and the rest because they showed low repeatability, which could not have been related to any specific alteration, suggesting that an analytical error could have occurred.…”
Section: Icp-ms Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the tungsten carbide cell used to mill the ceramics was a potential contaminator, Co and Ta were removed from the statistical procedure. The reason is that Co is a known binder of tungsten alloys and usually occurs along with Ta traces [43]. Furthermore, Sn, Ni, Cu and Zn were also removed, the first because it showed values under the quantification limit and the rest because they showed low repeatability, which could not have been related to any specific alteration, suggesting that an analytical error could have occurred.…”
Section: Icp-ms Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observe no distinct differences between powdered and crushed aliquots. Thus, there appears to be no need to grind the mica into a fine powder—a process that proved exceptionally difficult using hand tools and that may introduce metal contamination if done using a shatterbox or drillbit (e.g., Boulanger et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical changes due to use are potentially significant for reconstructing past behavior but will also confound sourcing efforts [34]. Sample preparation can cause enrichment of certain elements, particularly if steel components are used [35][36][37]. Other points of significance for interpreting bulk chemical data, but not related to weathering, are processes that produce spatially patterned variation withing the ceramic fabric.…”
Section: Compositional Approaches To Ceramic Production and Exchange ...mentioning
confidence: 99%