2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00710.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of nurse supervisors' different ethical decision-making styles

Abstract: The interpretation highlights the importance of the nurse supervisor's style for the outcome of clinical nursing supervision, as they are role models for the supervisees. There is a need for further research to explore the advantages and disadvantages of nurse supervisors' different ethical decision-making styles, especially in relation to the influence of clinical nursing supervision on the quality of care and various support systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
17
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(81 reference statements)
2
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the studies (95%) were published in English. 1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Six studies were published in Nursing Ethics (impact factor 1.093, evaluation year 2013), three in the Journal of Advanced Nursing (impact factor 1.685, evaluation year 2013) and two in the Journal of Community Health Nursing (impact factor 0.65, evaluation year 2013). Considering the classification that has seven levels of quality of evidence, 29 the results of this integrative review present a level of evidence of six, as they were derived from a single descriptive or qualitative study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of the studies (95%) were published in English. 1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Six studies were published in Nursing Ethics (impact factor 1.093, evaluation year 2013), three in the Journal of Advanced Nursing (impact factor 1.685, evaluation year 2013) and two in the Journal of Community Health Nursing (impact factor 0.65, evaluation year 2013). Considering the classification that has seven levels of quality of evidence, 29 the results of this integrative review present a level of evidence of six, as they were derived from a single descriptive or qualitative study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,[22][23] Five studies were performed in the United States, 1,14,[22][23]28 three in the UK, 20,[25][26] two in Australia, 15,19 Sweden, [12][13] Norway 17,24 and Canada 16,18 and one in Israel, 27 Brazil 4 and Chile. 21 Six studies were conducted in the hospital context, [12][13]15,[19][20]24 one with nurses of primary healthcare, pediatrics, adult health and obstetrics 14 and one only with nurses of primary healthcare. 17 The study participants were supervisors nurses, 1-2,15 nurses, 3,5,9 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations