The Shape of the Income Distribution and Economic Growth – Evidence from Swedish Labor Market Regions

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 5486 February 2011 ABSTRACT The Shape of the Income Distribution and Economic Growth: Evidence from Swedish Labor Market RegionsWe analyze the association between inequality and growth across 72 labor market regions in Sweden 1990Sweden -2006. Highly accurate measures of growth and inequality (gini, Q3, p9075, p5010) are derived from population register data. The regional set-up also reduces problems with omitted variable bias and endogeneity found in cross country comparisons since the regions within a country share the same redistributive policies and institutions. The findings suggest that inequality between the 90 th and 75 th percentiles enhances regional growth. This result no longer holds when we take into account changes in commuting patterns. Although only suggestive, the finding is interesting in that it is consistent with the hypothesis that inequality enhances growth by stimulating commuting incentives. JEL Classification:O4, D3, J6

Economic growth and crime: Is there an asymmetric relationship?

“…This technique is extensively used in panel-data growth studies to allow for unobserved panel heterogeneity and simultaneously control for endogeneity bias arising from the possibility that one or more of the explanatory variables in growth regressions may not be strictly exogenous (see e.g. Aisen and Veiga, 2013;Bond et al, 2001;Christiansen et al, 2013;Guariglia and Poncet, 2008;Hoeffler, 2002;Rooth and Stenberg, 2012;Saidi and Aloui, 2010;Yamarik, 2010). Indeed, a common feature of most empirical growth models is that causation between the dependent and the right-hand-side variables may run in both directions, leading to endogeneity bias.…”

Human capital inequality and economic growth: evidence with sub-national data from Thailand

“…Because of heterogeneity in cross country data, some studies emphasize on subnational data in inequality and growth nexus (Kennedy et al, 2017;De Dominicis et al, 2008;Naguib, 2015). There are several evidences that studies use sub-national data from the US (Benos and Karagiannis, 2017;Fallah and Partridge, 2007;Frank, 2009), Sweden (Rooth and Stenberg, 2012), Australia (Kennedy et al, 2017) and Turkey (Gungor, 2010). Researcher uses sub-national data used multi-year interval data, and Kennedy et al (2017) contributed in this issue, who used annual sub-national data of income inequality from Australia for the period of 1942-2013.…”

Institution and decomposition of natural disaster impact on growth

“…On the other hand, it has also been observed that inequality has a positive impact on growth (Forbes, 2000;Li and Zou, 1998). More recent work has presented evidence that there is a very weak association between inequality and growth (Rooth and Stenberg, 2012). That is, income inequality is considered to be one of the determinants of efficiency improvement, capital accumulation, and technological progress.…”