2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jc012486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Atlantic Water boundary current north of Svalbard in late summer

Abstract: Data from a shipboard hydrographic/velocity survey carried out in September 2013 of the region north of Svalbard in the Nansen Basin are analyzed to characterize the Atlantic Water (AW) boundary current as it flows eastward along the continental slope. Eight meridional transects across the current, spanning an alongstream distance of 180 km, allow for a detailed description of the current and the regional water masses. During the survey the winds were light and there was no pack‐ice. The mean section reveals t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
54
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This velocity is larger (about 5 times) than the eddy translational velocities estimated from a high‐resolution ocean model in the AW inflow north of Svalbard in Crews et al () of about 3.5 cm/s. We could expect the eddy translational velocities to be slightly smaller north of Svalbard compared to the WSC as the current is less energetic (current speed about 40 cm/s in the WSC and about 30 cm/s in the AW inflow north of Svalbard, Perez‐Hernandez et al, ). The second lens has slightly different properties compared to the first one: colder (3.21 °C vs. 3.79 °C) and deeper (400 vs. 225 m; Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This velocity is larger (about 5 times) than the eddy translational velocities estimated from a high‐resolution ocean model in the AW inflow north of Svalbard in Crews et al () of about 3.5 cm/s. We could expect the eddy translational velocities to be slightly smaller north of Svalbard compared to the WSC as the current is less energetic (current speed about 40 cm/s in the WSC and about 30 cm/s in the AW inflow north of Svalbard, Perez‐Hernandez et al, ). The second lens has slightly different properties compared to the first one: colder (3.21 °C vs. 3.79 °C) and deeper (400 vs. 225 m; Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another estimate of AW volume transport through the A‐TWAIN section calculated from hydrographic measurements collected in September 2012 by Våge et al () amounts to 1.6 Sv. Note that Pérez‐Hernández et al () and Våge et al () use a slightly different definition of AW than ours. The available measurements north of Svalbard are still too short in time, and Long‐term measurements are necessary for reliable comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent weakening of the halocline has reduced sea ice growth in parts of the Arctic, indicating AW will play a greater role in Arctic climate dynamics in the future (Polyakov et al, ). Mesoscale eddy formation has been suggested as a potential mechanism through which boundary current‐to‐basin transport is accomplished in the AW inflow area (Pérez‐Hernández et al, ; Våge et al, ), but the importance of this process is not well constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models indicate that eddies form from the WSC west of Svalbard and on the western slope of the Yermak Plateau (Hattermann et al, ), and some of these eddies migrate as far west as the East Greenland Current (Hattermann et al, ). The boundary current north of Svalbard is thought to take the form of a baroclinic jet (Pnyushkov et al, ), and Pérez‐Hernández et al () showed the current to be baroclinically unstable in an autumn survey. Several authors document eddies forming north of Svalbard and suggest that such eddies may not be uncommon (Pérez‐Hernández et al, ; Våge et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation