2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jc013198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscale Eddy Activity and Transport in the Atlantic Water Inflow Region North of Svalbard

Abstract: Mesoscale eddies are known to transport heat and biogeochemical properties from Arctic Ocean boundary currents to basin interiors. Previous hydrographic surveys and model results suggest that eddy formation may be common in the Atlantic Water (AW) inflow area north of Svalbard, but no quantitative eddy survey has yet been done for the region. Here vorticity and water property signatures are used to identify and track AW eddies in an eddy‐resolving sea ice‐ocean model. The boundary current sheds AW eddies along… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this calculation we did not take into account the vertical displacement that would have occurred (from 225‐m depth in transect 1a to 400‐m depth in transect 2a). This velocity is larger (about 5 times) than the eddy translational velocities estimated from a high‐resolution ocean model in the AW inflow north of Svalbard in Crews et al () of about 3.5 cm/s. We could expect the eddy translational velocities to be slightly smaller north of Svalbard compared to the WSC as the current is less energetic (current speed about 40 cm/s in the WSC and about 30 cm/s in the AW inflow north of Svalbard, Perez‐Hernandez et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this calculation we did not take into account the vertical displacement that would have occurred (from 225‐m depth in transect 1a to 400‐m depth in transect 2a). This velocity is larger (about 5 times) than the eddy translational velocities estimated from a high‐resolution ocean model in the AW inflow north of Svalbard in Crews et al () of about 3.5 cm/s. We could expect the eddy translational velocities to be slightly smaller north of Svalbard compared to the WSC as the current is less energetic (current speed about 40 cm/s in the WSC and about 30 cm/s in the AW inflow north of Svalbard, Perez‐Hernandez et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Analyses in this paper are shown from July 2005 to July 2009. Additional information about S800, including discussion of its ability to reproduce boundary current observations in Fram Strait and along the continental slope north of Svalbard, is given in Hattermann et al (), Sundfjord et al (), and Crews et al (). In general, the model was found to reproduce boundary current hydrography well, but with an approximately 1 °C cold bias in the AW that is likely advected into the model from upstream.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). In the Fram Strait area, roughly 2000 km upstream of the mooring sites, potential eddy origins were concentrated near the Yermak Plateau, the region north of Spitsbergen with strong mesoscale ocean dynamics (e.g., Hunkins, 1986;D'Asaro and Morison, 1992;Padman et al, 1992;Muench et al, 1992;Vaage et al, 2016;Crews et al, 2017), and further along the continental slope between Spitsbergen and 20 Franz Josef Land. Available mooring observations in this region show strong variability of currents expressed in terms of standard deviations of the velocity components (e.g., Pnyushkov et al, 2015).…”
Section: Two Potential Sources Of Eddy Formation In the Ebmentioning
confidence: 99%