2015
DOI: 10.1505/146554815814725031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: lessons for future engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
34
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Women's limited access to information about REDD+ limits their ability to engage in REDD+ and articulate their interests. This conforms with the Larson et al (2015) findings that women's limited knowledge about REDD+ was due to how information was disseminated and hence generally affected their participation in REDD+ implementation. In addition, household division of labor gives men more leisure time to be readily available to access information that comes into the village.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Women's limited access to information about REDD+ limits their ability to engage in REDD+ and articulate their interests. This conforms with the Larson et al (2015) findings that women's limited knowledge about REDD+ was due to how information was disseminated and hence generally affected their participation in REDD+ implementation. In addition, household division of labor gives men more leisure time to be readily available to access information that comes into the village.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several reports have suggested that gender should be carefully integrated in the design, monitoring and evaluation of REDD+ programmes, including gender-sensitive indicators and safeguard approaches. Systematic gender-responsive analysis should be carried out, including information on decision-making, gender perceptions and actual gender differences in interests in, as well as needs for effective engagement of women and men in REDD+ implementation in local contexts (Eggerts 2016, Larson et al 2015, Gurung and Setyowati 2012.…”
Section: Gender and Redd+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore a risk that further inequities could develop through REDD+ initiatives unless gender analysis is fully integrated into plans and activities (Chhatre et al 2012;Colfer 2013;Larson et al 2015;Thuy et al 2012). Failure to address gender or other social inequities may also facilitate elite capture of benefits among stakeholders, resulting in reduced outcome legitimacy.…”
Section: Lessons For Redd+mentioning
confidence: 99%