Analyzing multilevel governance in Indonesia: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of landuse change in Central and West Kalimantan

Myers, Rodd; Sanders, Arie; Larson, Anne M.; Prasti, R.D.; Ravikumar, A.

doi:10.17528/cifor/006058

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Overlapping jurisdictions are challenging in forest governance as they complicate communications and decisionmaking due to its multiple layers of roles and bureaucracies (Li 2007;Wollenberg et al 2009). Forest and land governance in Indonesia has been structured through centralization policies during the New Order era -decentralization 13 and re-centralization policies 14 have resulted in a continuous tug-of-war over power and authority (Myers et al 2016;Sahide et al 2016). areas (FMUs and national parks).…”

Section: Overlapping Jurisdictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics

Reed¹,

Ros-Tonen²,

Sunderland³

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

List of figures, tables and boxesFigures 1.1 Ten principles for integrated landscape approaches 5.1 Comparison of the three types of evaluation 5.2Example of a generic causal chain for a landscape approach 6.1An overview of the methods described in this chapter, their general purpose and the landscape approach principles and actions to which they apply. Methods are broadly arranged chronologically but in practice may be iteratively applied as required 6.2 Example of visualization of two possible future scenarios seen by local people and other stakeholders in La Paloma, Uruguay 7.1National development planning process 7.2 Common landscape approach principles found across each country's national development plans 7.3Landscape approach principles requiring further action 8.1 Spatial distribution of CREMAs

show abstract

Section: Overlapping Jurisdictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics

Reed¹,

Ros-Tonen²,

Sunderland³

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Decentralization of government and forestry in Indonesia

Thung¹

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The decentralization program that Indonesia embarked on in 1998 as part of widespread national reforms was unprecedented in scope and ambition. Although initially described in terms of a single, transformative event, over the last two decades it has unfolded in manifold, sometimes contradictory processes. The dynamics of decentralization continue today, even-or especially-in the remotest corners of the archipelago. Recent CIFOR research on the interface between human migration and forest management in Malinau, North Kalimantan showed the ongoing salience of legal reforms, the restructuring of local governments and innovations in forest governance. These decentralization processes give rise to hopes, aspirations and uncertainties that form the backdrop for decisions about both migration and land use. This paper synthesizes previous analyses, overviews and evaluations of decentralization, supplemented with insights from more recent publications. A final section considers in more detail the decentralization of the forestry sector and the related introduction of Forest Management Units. The primary aim was to present a concise and up-to-date overview of the aims, dimensions and dynamics of decentralization, to support the analysis of CIFOR's fieldwork data from Malinau. This paper may furthermore be useful to anyone interested in processes of decentralization in Indonesia or elsewhere.

show abstract

Analyzing multilevel governance in Indonesia: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of landuse change in Central and West Kalimantan

Cited by 2 publications

References 22 publications

Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics

Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics

Decentralization of government and forestry in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About