2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0952523811000393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing

Abstract: Starburst amacrine cells (SBACs) within the adult mammalian retina provide the critical inhibition that underlies the receptive field properties of direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs). The SBACs generate direction-selective output of GABA that differentially inhibits the DSGCs. We review the biophysical mechanisms that produce directional GABA release from SBACs and test a network model that predicts the effects of reciprocal inhibition between adjacent SBACs. The results of the model simulations sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These cells are critical for signaling directional selectivity onto downstream RGCs and are, therefore, necessary for the OKN response that is used to measure visual acuity (see Ref. 38 for review) and damage to them could underlie the decrease in visual acuity and the alterations in the OPs detected after blast in our model. The spread of caspase-1 labeling from small retinal regions at 3 days post blast to amacrine cells throughout the entire retina at 28 days post blast suggests spread of a molecular signal to neighboring cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cells are critical for signaling directional selectivity onto downstream RGCs and are, therefore, necessary for the OKN response that is used to measure visual acuity (see Ref. 38 for review) and damage to them could underlie the decrease in visual acuity and the alterations in the OPs detected after blast in our model. The spread of caspase-1 labeling from small retinal regions at 3 days post blast to amacrine cells throughout the entire retina at 28 days post blast suggests spread of a molecular signal to neighboring cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Barlow-Levick model relies on inhibition instead of excitation as the underlying mechanism, with null direction motion inhibiting a motion unit's response. Although the presence of Hassenstein-Reichardt and Barlow-Levick motion models has been ruled out in macaque, a similar mechanism relying on unbalanced inhibition is thought to underlie directional selectivity of starburst amacrine cells in primate retina [34].…”
Section: Visual Motion Estimation In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Drosophila, motion estimation can still be performed in the L1 (on) pathway if the L2 (off) pathway is blocked, and vice versa. In macaque, directionselective starburst amacrine cells (SACs) [34] can be found in the retina itself, and separate SACs are used to process on and off responses in parallel. Although direction selective, these cells show very limited speed sensitivity, with true velocity-sensitive neurons only found in higher visual areas.…”
Section: Visual Motion Estimation In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies of vision at the neuronal level that combine morphology, physiology, and computational modeling techniques to investigate how retinal amacrine cells generate direction selectivity in their post-synaptic partners (Masland, 2012b;Taylor & Smith, 2012;Tukker, Taylor, & Smith, 2004). Although the morphological and electrophysiological evidence provides a general explanation of the phenomenon (Taylor, He, Levick, & Vaney, 2000;Taylor & Smith, 2012), only the computational model allows a richer characterization of predictive, and not only descriptive, character (Stuart, Spruston, & Häusser, 2007).…”
Section: The Visual System As a Model For The Study Of Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the morphological and electrophysiological evidence provides a general explanation of the phenomenon (Taylor, He, Levick, & Vaney, 2000;Taylor & Smith, 2012), only the computational model allows a richer characterization of predictive, and not only descriptive, character (Stuart, Spruston, & Häusser, 2007).…”
Section: The Visual System As a Model For The Study Of Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%