The role of R&D investments and export on SMEs’ growth: a domain ambidexterity perspective

Abstract

Purpose International sales are critical for the prosperity of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), because of the limited size of their domestic market, but they can be difficult to attain for a number of reasons. The purpose of this paper is to investigate this topic and use a domain ambidexterity framework to analyze why the relationship between research and development (R&D) investments and export initiatives generates managerial tensions in high- and medium-technology industries. In this paper, it is claimed that R&D investments and internationalization can be conflicting objectives that entail a diversity of routines and managerial approaches. This aspect is critical, especially when SMEs are in the early stages of their life cycle and are resource constrained. Design/methodology/approach This issue is tested using multiple regressions on data collected through a survey that was conducted in 2014. The sample is composed of 221 SMEs operating in Italy in high-and medium-technology industries. Findings The estimates show that combining contemporary high R&D investments and high export activities negatively affects the growth of revenues of SMEs. In detail, when exports over revenue are below 10 percent, R&D investments have a positive effect on revenue growth, whereas when exports over revenue are above 50 percent, the effect of R&D investments on revenue growth is negative. However, age acts as a moderator on this relationship, thus implying that the effect of combining these initiatives varies according to the life cycle of a firm. In particular, combining R&D investments and export generates tensions that limit the growth of revenues in young SMEs (less than ten years old). For firms aged between 10 and 25 years, the effect is positive, while the effect is positive but not statistically significant for mature firms (older than 25 years). These results demonstrate that the diversity of the organizational maturity in SMEs has an impact on their ability to combine activities that require different capabilities (technological vs market). Originality/value This paper offers a theoretical contribution to the literature on domain ambidexterity, as it shows that combining contemporary innovation-related activities with international activities may constrain the performance of SMEs, according to the age of the firm. It extends the theoretical framework of domain ambidexterity to international studies and it reconciles previous mixed evidence about the combination of innovation and internationalization activities of SMEs.

SME innovation orientation: Evidence from Norwegian exporting SMEs

“…In other words, the intensity of innovation matters. Finally, we note that the benefits of ambidextrous innovation are also noted in the literature on the innovation strategies of exporting SMEs (Battaglia et al, 2018; Love and Roper, 2015), suggesting that this relationship prevails regardless of the international orientation of an SME. Consequently, we offer the following hypotheses on the link between innovation orientation and innovation performance:…”

The Effects of The Covid-19 Pandemic on Exploitative and Explorative Strategies of Pharmaceutical Industries in Brazil

“…The H2b hypothesis, which suggested the positive relationship between exploratory innovation strategy and performance was also supported ( = 0.508, p <0.05). These results are in line with research by Battaglia et al (2018); Jacobs and Maritz ( 2020 When the product of the exploitation and exploration constructs (combined perspective) was used to form ambidexterity, the hypothesis was also confirmed ( = 0.069, p <0.05), meeting Gibson and Birkinshaw (2004), He and Wong (2004) and Junni et al (2013) the ambidexterity model was also tested by adding the variables of the exploitation and exploration constructs (Popadiuk, 2012) also confirmed ( = 0.778, p <0.05).…”

“…Performance at the individual level refers to job satisfaction, goals achieved and personal adjustment; at the group level, it refers to morale, cohesion, efficiency and productivity; at the organizational level, it refers to efficiency, productivity, absenteeism rate, turnover rate and adaptability (Masa'deh, Al-Henzab, Tarhini, & Obeidat, 2018). Battaglia, Neirotti, and Paolucci (2018); Jacobs and Maritz (2020); Koriak, Lockett, Hayton, Nicolaou, and Mole (2018); Liao, Liu, and Zhang (2018); Morgan and Berthon (2008); Severgnini, Takahashi, and Abib (2019) the hypotheses related to the effect of the exploitative and exploratory innovation strategy on performance were specified as positive and significant and the exploitative-exploratory ambidextrous function was shown to be positive, despite research not validating these relationships (Cao et al, 2009;Severgnini et al, 2018).…”

Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges

“…Application of Industry 4.0 technologies may provide a positive direction towards corporate social responsibility and sustainable operations ( Kamble et al., 2020 ; Luthra and Mangla, 2018 ). According to Battaglia et al. (2018) , the experience of the global market helps in acquiring technologies and innovation in processes.…”