The Role of Firm Reputation and Management Experience for Firm Performance after Merger and Acquisition

Edi, Edi; Susanti, Erni

doi:10.22219/jrak.v11i1.14067

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(79 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Companies that do not carry out social activities will not last long in the business world (Cellier & Chollet, 2016). Companies carry out CSR actions not because of pressure from government regulations (Edi & Susanti, 2021) but indeed the company knows the potential benefits of these activities. CSR activity are highly associated with firm reputation, CSR practices contribute toward better image and strong market positioning (Bahta et al, 2021).…”

Section: Csr Awardmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This could also interpret firm reputation in investors' perceptions. Two companies are the same in every way but can have different price earning ratios (Edi & Susanti, 2021). This difference in ratio is caused by unique resource ownership, which cannot be imitated and cannot be replaced by a company that has a higher price earning ratio.…”

Section: Price Earning Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The level of trust from the buyer will be higher when making transactions with the seller. Higher levels of trust will result in lower monitoring, more confidence and generate positive perceptions about the company (Edi & Susanti, 2021). In the end, a good firm reputation will developed in companies that have a long life.…”

Section: Firm Agementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Market capitalization consists of two components, namely the number of shares outstanding and the market price. Market capitalization is an amalgamation of the perceptions of various investors leading to stock price movements in the market (Edi & Susanti, 2021). Market price volatility moves at any time or more specifically every second can change.…”

Section: Market Capitalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous research studies offer a variety of definitions and approaches to measure firm reputation. In general, it seems that firm reputation is an intangible asset that is multidimensional and reflects the different perceptions of corporate stakeholders on financial (Edi et al, 2020b;Edi & Susanti, 2021) and non-financial approaches (Barnett et al, 2006;Fombrun & van Riel, 1997;Lange et al, 2011;Petkova et al, 2014;Rindova et al, 2005). Firm reputation is a perceptual assessment of the company by stakeholders (Kaur & Singh, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Measuring Intangible Asset: Firm Reputation

Edi

Wati

2022

Business: Theory and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to find out the measurement of firm reputation that are still relevant to represent firm reputation. The measurement that are being tested in this research are CSR Award, Firm Age, Listing Age, Market Capitalization, Buy and Hold Abnormal Return and Price Earnings Ratio as the measurement for firm reputation. The novelty of this research is able to prove LQ45 are able to become a measurement to represent firm reputation. The data sample of this research are companies that listed in Indonesia stock exchange between 2016 till 2020. To select the research sample,this research conducted purposive sampling. This research data analysis is using SPSS program to conduct descriptive statistical test and spearman correlation test to measure the correlation between each variable. The results of this study show that measurement like listing age and BHAR are no longer a relevant measurement to measure firm reputation but CSR Award, Firm Age, Market Capitalization and Price earning Ratio are still a relevant measurement to measure firm reputation.This research also found that LQ45 can be used as the novel measurement for firm reputation. This research results will be helpful for researcher in firm reputation area.

show abstract

Section: Csr Awardmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Price Earning Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Firm Agementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Market Capitalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Measuring Intangible Asset: Firm Reputation

Edi

Wati

2022

Business: Theory and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Firm Value: Does Corporate Governance and Research & Development Investment Matter?

Murinda

Islahuddin

Nuraini

2021

JRAK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine the factors that affect firm value. This research uses purposive sampling method. The sample of the research is 45 financial companies (128 year-firm observations) listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2017-2019. Multiple regression analysis with unbalanced panel data was applied to analyze the data. A corporate governance index published by Globe and Mail with 4 sub-indices is adopted, namely board composition, shareholding and compensation policies, shareholder rights and disclosure. The results of this study indicate that good corporate governance and research & development investment have no effect on firm value. This explains that the implementation of good corporate governance and firm investment in research & development are not the main information for investors in making investments. However, intellectual capital and enterprise risk management disclosure have effect on firm value. The results can be used as a reference for researchers, especially in the accounting sector related to the development of measuring instruments for good corporate governance.

show abstract

Determination of Earnings Quality and Firm Value: New Evidence from Indonesian Non-financial Companies

Erna Wati

2023

JAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to determine the factors affecting earnings quality and firm value empirically. Two theories underlie the conceptual framework of this research, namely agency theory and signaling theory. Agency conflicts arise due to conflicts of interest and information asymmetry between principals as users of information and agents as providers of information. Then, the emergence of signal theory acts as a moral reason for companies to send signals to the market to reduce information asymmetry between agents and principals by reporting on the company's operating and financial performance. The statistical population of this research consists of all non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange covering the period of 2017-2020, giving 1.735 and 1.727 observations data for each dependent variable. This study employs multiple linear regression methods to test and analyze the data. The findings show a significant relationship between growth, Earnings Quality (EQ), and Firm Value (FV). Firm size, cash to current assets, current debt to total assets, listing age, market capitalization, and earnings management have no significant influence on EQ but significant on FV. The managerial capability only has a significant impact on EQ. Furthermore, the working capital ratio, earnings per share, firm age, price earnings ratio, and CSR award do not affect EQ and FV. The novelty of this research is to acumen the best factor affecting earnings quality and firm value.

show abstract

The Role of Firm Reputation and Management Experience for Firm Performance after Merger and Acquisition

Cited by 3 publications

References 34 publications

Measuring Intangible Asset: Firm Reputation

Measuring Intangible Asset: Firm Reputation

Firm Value: Does Corporate Governance and Research & Development Investment Matter?

Determination of Earnings Quality and Firm Value: New Evidence from Indonesian Non-financial Companies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About