The Right Kind of Wrong: A “Knowledge in Pieces” Approach to Science Learning in Museums

Abstract

Research has highlighted the vast gulf that exists between experts' and novices' understandings of science, and how difficult it is to bridge this gulf. When this research is applied to the design of museum exhibits and outreach material, it becomes clear that there is a tension between being scientifically correct and communicating effectively to a broad, diverse audience. In this paper we present a new approach to thinking about science learning in museums. Drawing on decades of research from the learning sciences, we argue that being “wrong” is an inescapable part of learning, and that not all simplifications are problematic. Instead, being “wrong” involves the gradual restructuring of many fine‐grained intuitive or commonsense notions that persist throughout the learning process and play an essential role in scientific expertise. We discuss the implications of adopting this approach for museum design.

Name-Dropping or Understanding?: Teaching to Observe Geologically

“…The teaching activities utilized this opportunity as an introduction to noticing the patterns of everyday items, which can be transferred to rocks, as illustrated by Figure . This way, the teaching activity provided a link between noticing patterns as an everyday observation and as a geological practice (Scott et al., ), without actually replacing the everyday feature with a more “scientific” feature (Davis, Horn, & Sherin, ).…”

Stop avoiding the inevitable: The effects of anthropomorphism in science writing for non-experts

“…However, some research also suggests there may be constructive uses of anthropomorphism. Educators have used anthropomorphism to increase engagement (Watts and Bentley, 1994) and confidence (Taber et al, 2006) with unfamiliar concepts, constructively using the emotive effects (Waytz et al, 2010b) of anthropomorphism while building towards a more correct explanation (Davis et al, 2013).…”