2017
DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2017.1413405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The restructuring of old industrial areas in East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
41
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While studies in economic geography tend to stress the positive effects of geographical clustering on growth, Hassink elaborates on the idea that clusters may also end up in a state of negative lock-in (see also Hassink, 2005;Schamp, 2005;Hassink and Shin, 2005). In his contribution, Hassink makes the case that the emergence and persistence of these negative effects can be well explained by an evolutionary economic geography approach.…”
Section: Part 4 Institutions Co-evolution and Economic Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studies in economic geography tend to stress the positive effects of geographical clustering on growth, Hassink elaborates on the idea that clusters may also end up in a state of negative lock-in (see also Hassink, 2005;Schamp, 2005;Hassink and Shin, 2005). In his contribution, Hassink makes the case that the emergence and persistence of these negative effects can be well explained by an evolutionary economic geography approach.…”
Section: Part 4 Institutions Co-evolution and Economic Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equally important role in explaining these transformations has been played by analyses of specific regions traditionally perceived as industrial or postindustrial, such as Ruhrgebiet (Knapp, 1998;Van Dijk, 2002;Eckart, 2003), the Ostrava region (Sucháček, 2005(Sucháček, , 2010Hruška-Tvrdý, 2010;Rumpel nad Slach, 2012), Donbas (Swain, 2007), Nord/Pas-de-Calais (Leboutte, 2009), the Katowice conurbation (Klasik and Heffner, 2001;Tkocz, 2001Tkocz, , 2003Domański, 2002;Mikołajec, 2008) and others (Cooke, 1995;Hassink and Shin, 2005;Trippl and Otto, 2009;Wirth et al, 2012). Although research results and conclusions in some of these works are diverse, as a whole they form the bases for a critical analysis of the issues under discussion here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 "It is, perhaps, at this stage worth noting how later generations of mainly Anglo-Saxon scholars by deliberat e decision or following the prevailing tradition in contemporary economic geography gradually turned to producing very descriptive, ideographic work…[which replaced former economics -based cluster explanations with] "…a one-sided model that addressed the existence argument in novel ways but almost totally disregarded the extension and exhaustion arguments" (Maskell and Kebir, 2005, p. 6). Hassink and Dong -Ho (2005) indirectly supports their view, by observing that many contemporary cluster scholars "…belong to the recently coined family of territorial innovation models….They increasingly turned from "economic" reasons for growth of new industrial agglomerations to 'social' and 'cultural' reasons... (p. 571, emphasis supplied).…”
Section: Cluster Cycles and Phasesmentioning
confidence: 82%