2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of quantifying upright standing postures as a baseline diagnostic clinical tool

Abstract: The poor repeatability of postures documented using the studied method brings into question the validity of this postural analysis approach for either diagnostic use or tracking changes in response to treatment. Users of such postural analysis tools should interpret postural deviations from a vertical reference with caution, as there are many inherent factors that can contribute to the variability of these measured postures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
70
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
70
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methodological precautions 3,4,6 and standards 3,12,32 can be found in the literature. Results with good reproducibility and intra-and interrater agreement have been reported for most angle measures evaluated in adults 3,6,11,28,29,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some methodological precautions 3,4,6 and standards 3,12,32 can be found in the literature. Results with good reproducibility and intra-and interrater agreement have been reported for most angle measures evaluated in adults 3,6,11,28,29,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The use of photography as a postural record is recommended for its simplicity and low cost and for the possibility of creating a database to follow postural development 6 and, therefore, observe subtle modifications 24,[26][27][28] . Other favorable arguments for the use of photography were presented by Niererk et al 29 , who analyzed the seated posture of adolescents by comparing low dosage X-rays (LODOX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dunk et al 25 studied the reliability of photogrammetry in determining a stable measure of individual posture. A wide coefficient of variation and low ICC indicated the poor repeatability of the method for the evaluation of subjects on the same day and on different days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings are consistent with those reported by other authors who assessed the angle of kyphosis and lordosis using photogrammetry and imaging technique applying X-rays. When they compared photogrammetry results with X-ray images these authors found positive correspondence in the case of thoracic kyphosis angle, yet measurement of angle of lordosis with photogrammetric method carried significant error [27,28]. Different findings related to measurement of lumbar lordosis were shown by Drzał-Grabiec et al, who reported that these two methods produced consistent results, yet the angular values identified with the non-invasive method were lower [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%