The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score

Yosmaoğlu, Hayrı Baran; Doğan, Deha; Sönmezer, Emel

doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3

Cited by 6 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We hypothesized strong correlation between the OES and the QuickDASH score as well as similar domains from the physical component section of the SF-36. Results confirmed this hypothesis showing a strong correlation health and vitality subscales [18]. The original OES study showed divergent validity with low correlations between all three Oxford elbow score domains and the SF-36 mental health and general health perception domains [9].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

“…Results from the general health subscale of the PCS and all MCS subscales were non-significant. Studies by Yosmaoglu et al showed non-significant results for correlation between the general health and vitality subscales [ 18 ]. The original OES study showed divergent validity with low correlations between all three Oxford elbow score domains and the SF-36 mental health and general health perception domains [ 9 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Notwithstanding, the standardized factor loadings were acceptable indicating adequate correlation of the items to their respective constructs. Research by Yosmaoglu et al supported the 3-factor structure with an excellent relative chi-square value, and acceptable threshold for all other parameters except AGFI which had a lower value and RMSEA with a high value [ 18 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to studies from Juniper et al, correlation values of > 0.50, 0.35 to 0.50, and < 0.35 can be interpreted as strong, moderate, and weak, respectively [ 17 ]. Based on this and previous studies on OES construct validity [ 10 , 18 ], we proposed the following hypothesis for convergent and discriminant validity. Strong correlation coefficients ( r > 0.5) between OES and the Quick Dash.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Oxford Elbow score (OES) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to evaluate patients before and after elbow surgery. Although various translated versions of the score are available, there is no Chinese mandarin version. The aim of this study was to develop a Chinese language version of the OES and evaluate its psychometric properties for clinical use. Methods The English version of the OES was forward translated into Chinese, followed by a backward translation into English. Then a final Chinese version was produced following expert committee discussions and pilot study of 11 patients. A smart device compatible electronic version of the OES was designed and completed by 70 patients with elbow pathology alongside the Quick-Dash and the SF-36. Reliability was assessed by measuring intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability and Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to test the construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to evaluate the 3-factor structure of the OES. Results The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.906 and for the 3 different domains Function, Pain, and Social-psychological was 0.806, 0.796, and 0.776 respectively. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.764 and for the three different domains Function, Pain, and Social-psychological was 0.764, 0.624, and 0.590 respectively. The Spearman’s coefficient for correlation, between the QuickDASH and OES domains Function, Pain, and Social-psychological, was − 0.824, − 0.734, and − 0.622 respectively, showing strong correlation (r > 0.5; p < 0.01). There were moderate correlations between OES domains and the physical functioning, role physical, and strong correlations with bodily pain subscales of the PCS domain of the SF-36; results were insignificant for all other subscales. Conclusion Our translated Chinese mandarin OES version (mainland) was reliable and valid, suitable for evaluating elbow disorders in the Chinese population. Reliability was measured using both the Cronbach’s α for internal consistency and the intraclass correlation. Results were classified as “excellent” and were similar to results from the original OES. Electronic PROMs were used instead of the traditional paper-based PROMs for collection of data which was well tolerated by patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the OES have already been done in five languages: Dutch, 7 Danish, 22 Persian, 9 Turkish, 28 and German. 20 An adaptation to the Italian language and culture has not yet been done.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score

Padovani¹,

Capuzzo²,

Massari³

et al. 2021

JSES International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate surgical elbow outcomes. This scoring system has been translated into other languages. Given the lack of an Italian version of the OES, the present study was designed to establish, culturally adapt, and validate the Italian version. Methods The OES questionnaire was culturally adapted to Italian patients in accordance with the literature guidelines with a pilot phase including seven patients with elbow problems and seven healthy subjects. The study includes 110 participants from three hospitals, who underwent elbow surgery for acute (70%) or chronic diseases. At least one month after elbow surgery, at the “index visit”, the physician completed the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and patients completed the following questionnaires: the Italian OES, the shortened version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire ( Quick DASH) and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient in ten patients who completed the OES again two-three days after the index visit. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Responsiveness was evaluated in 68 patients who answered the questionnaires four months after the index visit, using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the effect size and the standardized response mean calculation. Results Cronbach's alpha was excellent: 0.86 (0.82-0.90) for OES pain, 0.92 (0.90-0.94) for OES function, and 0.90 (0.87-0.93) for OES social/psychological. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (0.78-0.98) for OES pain, 0.91 (0.71-0.97) for OES function, 0.95 (0.83-0.98) for OES social-psychological and 0.93 (0.76-0.98) for OES total. The Spearman ρ was >0.7 for OES pain and Quick DASH, for OES function and both Quick DASH and Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and for OES social-psychological and Quick DASH. Regarding responsiveness, the mean of the changes between the two visits ranged from 33.9 for OES pain, to 44 points for OES function and OES social/psychological. The effect size and the standardized response mean were >0.8 for all OES domains. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the Italian version of the OES, translated in accordance with the international standardized guidelines, is reliable, valid, and responsive in patients who have undergone elbow surgery.

show abstract

Cemented radial head arthroplasty: Does radiographic loosening have an effect on clinical and functional outcomes? Average 10 years’ results

Pehlivanoğlu

Erşen

Bayram

et al. 2021

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score

Cited by 6 publications

References 10 publications

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score

Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score

Cemented radial head arthroplasty: Does radiographic loosening have an effect on clinical and functional outcomes? Average 10 years’ results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About