1998
DOI: 10.1123/japa.6.4.363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reliability and Validity of a 6-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Physical Endurance in Older Adults

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a 6-min walk test as a measure of physical endurance in older adults. Seventy-seven subjects, ages 60-87. performed three separate 6-min walk tests and a treadmill test and completed questionnaire items assessing physical activity level and functional status. The 6-min walk had good test-retest reliability (.88 <R < .94). particularly when a practice trial preceded the test trial. Convergent validity of the 6-min walk was demonstrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
247
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
247
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This test had been successfully used to evaluate the physical resistance of patients carrier of several clinical conditions; however, only recently it was approved for the use on healthy elderly people 19 . An outstanding increase on the aerobic resistance of the hydrogymnastics group was also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test had been successfully used to evaluate the physical resistance of patients carrier of several clinical conditions; however, only recently it was approved for the use on healthy elderly people 19 . An outstanding increase on the aerobic resistance of the hydrogymnastics group was also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoring requires that participants check one of three responses associated with each of the 12-items: can do (score=2), can do with help (score=1), or cannot do (score=0). Scores are thereafter summed with a potential range of scores between 0 and 24 (Rikli and Jones 1998;Rikli and Jones 2013). The age-adjusted scoring option for defining moderate functioning that reflects projected ability for physical independence at age 90 years, rather than current ability to function independently, as previously proposed, was used.…”
Section: Physical Independence and Adl Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRF was determined using a submaximal exercise test, which could have over/ underestimated our results. However, this test is considered a valid option to estimate CRF specifically in elderly subjects that were not recommended to be exposed to a maximal effort 37 . Both non-central and central obesity groups with lower CRF had an insufficient number of participants (n=25 and 24, respectively) in our final regression analysis, not allowing consistent results to be drawn about these specific groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%