2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Importance of Employee Engagement, Other Job Attitudes, and Trait Affect as Predictors of Job Performance

Abstract: We used univariate and multivariate relative weight analysis to assess the relative importance of a new job attitude (employee engagement), several longstanding job attitudes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job involvement, perceived organizational support, and work centrality), and trait positive and negative affect as predictors of 3 important components of overall employee performance: task performance, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and counterproductive (or deviant) work behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
92
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
8
92
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The component of employee engagement has a considerable value towards individual and organizational performance outcomes (Dalal et al, 2012). Therefore, one can ideally understand the prominence of the concept for business that are enthusiastic about gaining competitive strength and promising business results.…”
Section: Moderation Of Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component of employee engagement has a considerable value towards individual and organizational performance outcomes (Dalal et al, 2012). Therefore, one can ideally understand the prominence of the concept for business that are enthusiastic about gaining competitive strength and promising business results.…”
Section: Moderation Of Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This virtue of the Vanguard Method encourages team members to point out the system pitfalls that decrease system performance, and introduce them as the experts through which the new design of processes is made. Team members, this way, get the chance of self-development and continuous learning (Dalal et al 2012). …”
Section: The Vanguard Method: Philosophy and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through organic systems, a great deal of decision making authority is delegated to team members to allow for flexibility and quick response to unpredictable circumstances (Griffin 1999). Team members, this way, are fully engaged in performing their tasks with high performance effectiveness (Dalal et al 2012). They can approach each other informally as well as officially as the personal relationships comprise an important aspect for the organisational life in such environment (McKenna 2006), team members can also approach other departments where needed to find expertise with the required level of information to solve a problem (Courtright et al 1989).…”
Section: Characterising Organisational Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to leadership, Braddy et al (2013) examined the relative importance of different leader behaviors for predicting derailment, whereas Snell et al (2013) used a similar approach to understand how political skill predicts managerial effectiveness. Concerning job performance, Dalal et al (2012) examined the relative importance of employee engagement, personality, and job attitudes as predictors of performance, and Gentry et al (2013) used relative weight analysis to understand how different character virtues might be more or less important for managers at different levels of an organization. Scherer et al (2013) used relative weight analysis to examine the contributions of sub-clinical psychopathy and the global traits of the Five Factor Model in the prediction of counter-productive workplace behaviors.…”
Section: Applications Of Relative Weight Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%