2012
DOI: 10.1080/15022250.2012.724923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Service Failure Attributions, Service Recovery Justice and Recovery Satisfaction in the Context of Airlines

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of failure attributions (stability and controllability) and service recovery justice (i.e. distributive justice, interactional justice, and procedural justice) to recovery satisfaction and the moderating relationship of service recovery justice on the link between failure attributions and recovery satisfaction in the context of airline. Data were gathered by means of a survey from airline passengers who experienced a service failure and subsequently a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth area identified is service encounters and performative work, with studies looking into the nature of performative work (Baerenholdt & & Jensen, 2009), service encounter practices (Svingstedt, 2013), critical encounters (Lundberg, 2011), verbalized hospitality (Ivkov et al, 2019), service failure and recovery (Nikbin et al, 2012), service dimensions as drivers of overall satisfaction (Matzler et al, 2006), meal experiences (Hansen et al, 2005), and development of a measurement tool for meal experiences (Hansen, 2014), in addition to research on hotel sleep experiences (Pallesen et al, 2016). This area of research has strong roots in the Nordic service theory and research tradition (e.g.…”
Section: Current State Of Hospitality Research In a Nordic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth area identified is service encounters and performative work, with studies looking into the nature of performative work (Baerenholdt & & Jensen, 2009), service encounter practices (Svingstedt, 2013), critical encounters (Lundberg, 2011), verbalized hospitality (Ivkov et al, 2019), service failure and recovery (Nikbin et al, 2012), service dimensions as drivers of overall satisfaction (Matzler et al, 2006), meal experiences (Hansen et al, 2005), and development of a measurement tool for meal experiences (Hansen, 2014), in addition to research on hotel sleep experiences (Pallesen et al, 2016). This area of research has strong roots in the Nordic service theory and research tradition (e.g.…”
Section: Current State Of Hospitality Research In a Nordic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service failure (SF) is defined as any real and/or perceived service related problem that appears during a consumer's experience with a company (Maxham III, 2001). Failures produce intensive, immediate and emotional reactions (Seiders and Berry, 1998) Sparks, 2003;Nikbin, et al, 2012;Sparks and McColl-Kennedy, 2001). Since service failures are extremely costly for firms (Maxham III, 2001), and failures are inevitable during service delivery (Webster and Sundaram, 1998), organizations need to respond effectively to failures to maintain their performance and their relationships with customers (Schoefer and Ennew, 2005;Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Service Failure and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction is a subjective evaluation of emotions, and therefore it may lead to positive or negative feeling of fulfillment [25]. Customer satisfaction is imperative in any businesses because it can lead to loyalty and positive word of mouth [26].…”
Section: B Recovery Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%