2007
DOI: 10.1080/03634520701466398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Perceived Instructor Aggressive Communication and College Student Involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, teacher behaviors such as caring, listening and showing concern for students increase students' tendency to seek academic help, especially in elementary and middle school classrooms (e.g., Newman, 2002Newman, , 2008Ryan et al, 1998). Moreover, Myers, Edwards, Wahl, and Martin (2007) found that instructor aggressive communication behaviors were negatively related to college students' willingness to ask questions, overt information seeking and engagement. Thus, we expect both emotional and instrumental teacher support to predict students' help-seeking behavior.…”
Section: Motivational and Emotional Responsesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, teacher behaviors such as caring, listening and showing concern for students increase students' tendency to seek academic help, especially in elementary and middle school classrooms (e.g., Newman, 2002Newman, , 2008Ryan et al, 1998). Moreover, Myers, Edwards, Wahl, and Martin (2007) found that instructor aggressive communication behaviors were negatively related to college students' willingness to ask questions, overt information seeking and engagement. Thus, we expect both emotional and instrumental teacher support to predict students' help-seeking behavior.…”
Section: Motivational and Emotional Responsesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Verbal aggressiveness consists of attacks on the character, the ability, in appearance and in the background, contempt, ridicule, threats, profanity, curses, loud voices, teasing gestures [4] [8]- [14]. When students receive verbal aggressiveness from their instructors, they indicate lower levels of motivation, satisfaction, rapport with the instructors and a more hostile learning environment [15]- [28] that is not conducive to attendance and class climate [29] [30] and interpersonal communication between students and instructors [31]- [36]. Also, research has shown that instructors' verbal aggressiveness is negatively correlated with affective learning [37] [38], interpersonal attractiveness [39] [40], fair play behaviors [41] of students, as they avoid asking questions and do not try to maintain the communication outside of the classroom [30].…”
Section: Verbal Aggressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two aggressive communication traits are argumentativeness and verbal aggressive-gas Rocca & McCroskey, 1999;Schrodt, 2003). Also, research has shown that the students' class participation is negatively correlated with instructors' verbal aggressiveness, as they avoid asking them questions and do not try to maintain the communication outside the classroom (Bekiari, 2012;Myers et al, 2007). PE teachers' negative communication with students has as a result the rise of anti-social behaviors for the latest, as well as the absence of a beneficial interaction, satisfaction and motivation among them (Avtgis & Rancer, 2008;Claus, Booth-Butterfield, & Chory, 2012;Rancer & Avtgis, 2006;Rocca & McCroskey, 1999;Schrodt, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PE teachers' negative communication with students has as a result the rise of anti-social behaviors for the latest, as well as the absence of a beneficial interaction, satisfaction and motivation among them (Avtgis & Rancer, 2008;Claus, Booth-Butterfield, & Chory, 2012;Rancer & Avtgis, 2006;Rocca & McCroskey, 1999;Schrodt, 2003). Verbal aggressiveness affects negatively students' perceptions of their instructors (Bekiari, 2017a,b;Bekiari, Digelidis & Sakellariou, 2006;Bekiari, Patsiaouras, Kokaridas, & Sakellariou, 2006;Myers et al, 2007;Schrodt, 2003;Wrench & Punyanunt-Carter, 2005), as they are considered less reliable, hostile, ideologically biased Linvill & Mazer, 2013;Mazer & Stowe, 2016;Snyder, Forbus, & Cistulli, 2012;Teven, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%