2013
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2013.791100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between organisational culture and service quality through organisational learning framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, Cho et al [54] argue that the distinctive features of KIBS' organizational culture are conducive to high innovation levels. This culture includes innovation within its conceptualization, where the members of an organization are open-minded, flexible, and oriented towards obtaining specialized knowledge, are not afraid to face new challenges or to adapt and make transitions of their line of services to respond or anticipate market demands with quality.…”
Section: Product Innovation In Knowledge-intensive Business Service (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Cho et al [54] argue that the distinctive features of KIBS' organizational culture are conducive to high innovation levels. This culture includes innovation within its conceptualization, where the members of an organization are open-minded, flexible, and oriented towards obtaining specialized knowledge, are not afraid to face new challenges or to adapt and make transitions of their line of services to respond or anticipate market demands with quality.…”
Section: Product Innovation In Knowledge-intensive Business Service (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent validity can be tested by calculating composite reliability (CR), Cronbach's alpha, and the average variance extracted (AVE) of each construct (Gefen, Straub, & Boudreau, 2000). Cronbach's alpha represents the ratio between the true and the observed variance; values greater than 0.7 denote homogeneity of data and good scaling of the instrument (Pantouvakis & Bouranta, 2017) (Cho, Kim, Park, & Cho, 2013). When the AVE by each factor exceeds the proposed cut-off value of 0.5 also indicates the convergent validity of the instrument, and thus the scales are judged to be reliable.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desta forma, a partir de alguns desses estudos seminais, várias tipologias têm sido testadas empiricamente, ora considerando a cultura organizacional como variável dependente, ora como variável independente, a saber: (i) estudos a partir da matriz de Cameron e Quinn (2011): perfis de cultura organizacional e autenticidade no trabalho (Reis e Azevedo, 2015); relação entre a cultura organizacional e liderança (Barreto et al, 2013); inovação (Büschgens et al, 2013); qualidade do serviço (Cho et al, 2013); relação entre a cultura de informação e efetividade organizacional (Choo, 2013); (ii) a partir do modelo de Handy (1979): relação entre as estratégias de remuneração e cultura organizacional (Russo et al, 2012); (iii) utilização dos índices de cultura organizacional de House et al (2004): semelhanças e diferenças nas instituições de educação superior a partir da avaliação das suas culturas (Coleta e Coleta, 2017); e (iv) a partir das dimensões de Hofstede (1983Hofstede ( , 1993: entendimento da cultura de uma IES privada no Brasil (Zonatto et al, 2012); discussão da orientação à distância do poder individual entre líderes e liderados (Kirkman et al, 2009); identificação de dimensões culturais globais e específicas referentes ao humor na publicidade (Alden et al, 1993); um estudo bibliométrico sobre estas dimensões em negócios internacionais (Ferreira et al, 2014).…”
Section: A Relação Entre Cultura Organizacional E Efetividade Organizunclassified