2012
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities

Abstract: <p>Flexibility in learning provides a student room for volitional control and an array of strategies and encourages persistence in the face of difficulties. Autonomy in and control over one’s learning process can be seen as a condition for self-regulated learning. There are a number of categories and dimensions for flexible learning; following professional publications, time, location, lesson content, pedagogy method, learning style, organization, and course requirements are all elements to consider. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In online settings, learners need to be more independent and self-directed than in traditional settings. Online activities are open regarding time, pace, and content, which means that self-regulation learning skills such as time management are required (Barak et al, 2016;Barnard et al, 2009;Bergamin, Ziska, Werlen, & Siegenthaler, 2012;Garrison, 2000;Kauffman, 2004). Students lacking self-regulation learning skills may misconceive the autonomy of the learning environment and underperform (Barnard et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Self-regulation Learning Questionnaire For Lgdm Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In online settings, learners need to be more independent and self-directed than in traditional settings. Online activities are open regarding time, pace, and content, which means that self-regulation learning skills such as time management are required (Barak et al, 2016;Barnard et al, 2009;Bergamin, Ziska, Werlen, & Siegenthaler, 2012;Garrison, 2000;Kauffman, 2004). Students lacking self-regulation learning skills may misconceive the autonomy of the learning environment and underperform (Barnard et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Self-regulation Learning Questionnaire For Lgdm Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De modo geral, há consenso entre diversos pesquisadores de que a capacidade de autorregulação dos discentes é essencial na melhor qualidade da aprendizagem, desempenho, tomada de decisão, resolução de problemas e utilização do tempo (Schunk, 2001;Zimmerman, 2002;Boruchovitch, 2004;Dias & Leite, 2010;Frison & Moraes, 2010;Rosário, Nunes, Magalhães, Rodrigues, Pinto, & Ferreira, 2010;Bergamin et al, 2012;Lima & Bruni, 2012;Simão;Frison, 2013).…”
Section: Modelo De Autorregulação Da Aprendizagem Proposto Por Zimmermanunclassified
“…Diversos estudos têm apontado que as características do indivíduo afetam a aprendizagem (Chen & Paul, 2003;Dias & Leite, 2010;Cavanaugh, Lamkin, & Hu, 2012;Bergamin, Ziska, Werlen, & Siegenthaler, 2012) e que distintos comportamentos da autorregulação estão associados a diferentes resultados acadêmicos (Lynch & Dembo, 2004). Outros estudos apontam existir diferenças significativas entre aluno autorregulado e outros que precisam de regulação externa no aprendizado (Arias, Barca Lozano, Gonzalez Cabanach, & Núñez Pérez, 1999;Xu, Benson, Mudrey-Camino, & Steiner, 2010;Richter & Schmid, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…What evidence there is suggests that modelling, direct instruction, facilitation, and "providing students with opportunities for choice, control, influence over assessments, and peer collaboration [have] been shown to invite student SRL" (Vassallo, 2013, p.244). Additionally, research (Bergamin, Werlen, Siegenthaler, and Ziska, 2012) shows that learning flexibility-in terms of time, teacher contact, and content-is positively related to increased SRL.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%