2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between corporate governance and community engagement: Evidence from the Australian mining companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in Australia confirms that corporate governance mechanisms can improve citizen participation (Lin et al, 2015). This finding is consistent with the proposal of a model of proactive corporate governance that seeks short-term and long-term benefits (Mihaela et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study in Australia confirms that corporate governance mechanisms can improve citizen participation (Lin et al, 2015). This finding is consistent with the proposal of a model of proactive corporate governance that seeks short-term and long-term benefits (Mihaela et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Accordingly, sustainability does not even appear in performance measurement at the strategic level, though it should be an integral part of strategic planning. Lin et al (2015) study the relationship between corporate governance and community participation in Australian mining companies between 2005 and 2013. They confirm that corporate governance mechanisms improve citizen participation due to the companies' significant environmental, economic, and social impact.…”
Section: Corporate Governance and Its Relationship With Sustainabilitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the third level, the firm and the community work together on different initiatives, implying more company time and engagement. The traditional analysis of reports, those which obtain terms for variables through content analysis, focuses on the first level (Fuisz‐Kehrbach, ; Lin, Li, & Bu, ; Ranängen & Lindman, ; Wirth, Kulczycka, Hausner, & Koński, ). However, as reporting has advanced, the three levels of engagement have been incorporated through the use of the GRI framework as a basis to define variables (Barkemeyer et al, ) and the “Social Licence to Operate” approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "community" refers to the inhabitants of the immediate and surrounding regions influenced by the firm's operations [162]. Obviously, a responsible company should make efforts to generate enduring positive effects on the communities in relation to the quality of life, social justice, inclusion, job creation, social progress through innovation, ecological issues, viability, housing, and so on [163][164][165].…”
Section: Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%