The relationship between active learning, course innovation, and teaching Earth systems thinking: A structural equation modeling approach

Abstract

Earth systems thinking (EST), or thinking of the Earth as a complex system made up of interworking subsystems, has been shown to reflect the highest level of knowing and understanding in the geosciences. Previous work has found four frameworks of EST that repeatedly appear in the geoscience education literature. This study aims to quantitatively build on this work by employing structural equation modeling to understand the current state of EST teaching as shown by the 2016 iteration of the National Geoscience Faculty Survey (United States; n = 2615). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on survey items to understand and develop three models, one for EST teaching practices, one for course changes, and one for active-learning teaching practices. Analyses revealed that reported EST teaching practices relate back to the four EST frameworks proposed in the literature. The three models explored in this study were used to build a full structural model, where it was hypothesized that active-learning teaching practices would predict EST course changes and EST teaching. However, the model revealed that EST course changes mediate, or bring about, the relationship between active-learning teaching practices and EST teaching. In other words, the relationship between active-learning and EST teaching practices is not direct. This implies the need for continued efforts to provide professional development opportunities in both active-learning teaching practices and EST, as active-learning practices are not sufficient to implicitly teach EST skills. Results also revealed that the teaching approaches that emphasize modeling and complexity sciences had the weakest relationship to the broader EST teaching practices, suggesting a need for more professional development opportunities as they relate to systems modeling, quantitative reasoning, and complexity sciences in the context of the Earth sciences.

How to Teach Pre-Service Teachers to Make a Didactic Program? The Collaborative Learning Associated with Mobile Devices

“…Educational institutions have presented this new direction, a recent approach that distances itself from traditional and passive methods [2], through a commitment to more innovative teaching processes [3]. This orientation essentially responds to the positive impact that they generate on issues such as student training [4][5][6][7][8][9] or, linked to this, the social environment [10].…”

Bibliometric Study of Scientific Production on the Term Collaborative Learning in Web of Science

“…In this case, teachers must become guides of this pedagogical act. The collaborative learning method is a clear example of an active teaching method [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. This teaching methodology requires two or more people who, thanks to the sharing of various resources and skills, can acquire the curricular elements proposed.…”

“…For this reason, the line of action in the educational and pedagogical field must be directed towards the development of new innovative practices. This can have a positive influence on the overall development of students [5][6][7][8][9][10], increasing their motivation and satisfaction [11]. However, the inclusion of these innovative practices in the teaching-learning processes requires an effort and coordination of all the players involved.…”

Collaborative Learning Based on Harry Potter for Learning Geometric Figures in the Subject of Mathematics

“…Therefore, educational institutions are betting on the implementation of innovative teaching processes [2] and are trying to move away from traditional [3] and passive [4] didactic approaches. This is because innovative practices have a positive impact on the training of students [5][6][7][8][9][10], and thus on the social environment [11,12].…”