1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(99)00016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regulating power market on the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool: an econometric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulation of positive and negative imbalances translates to penalties for the market participants, defined as the volume of electricity in imbalance times the imbalance price. These imbalance prices are different for positive and negative imbalances, and highly variable, being a function of the power volume that needs to be regulated globally in the system, supposed to reflect the production (or curtailment) costs, and including a premium for readiness [11]. As a consequence in such market environment, the profit of the power producer is defined as the revenue obtained from the day-ahead market minus the penalties resulting from imbalance regulation costs (see revenue formulation in e.g.…”
Section: Imbalance Management In a Market Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regulation of positive and negative imbalances translates to penalties for the market participants, defined as the volume of electricity in imbalance times the imbalance price. These imbalance prices are different for positive and negative imbalances, and highly variable, being a function of the power volume that needs to be regulated globally in the system, supposed to reflect the production (or curtailment) costs, and including a premium for readiness [11]. As a consequence in such market environment, the profit of the power producer is defined as the revenue obtained from the day-ahead market minus the penalties resulting from imbalance regulation costs (see revenue formulation in e.g.…”
Section: Imbalance Management In a Market Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore ideally, a market participant using a wind/EES should slightly reduce his bid from the wind power point forecasts in order to ensure there will be more energy stored than released, which in terms of positive and negative imbalances would result in even volumes. In order to assess the economic feasibility of the methodology, the operation of the combined wind/EES plant for the 1 year is simulated, for 20 possibilities for EES sizing: (1) no storage, (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) dynamic EES sizing based on the 17 quantiles rising from 15% to 95%, thus for risk parameters going from 5% till 85%, with 5% increment, and the 99% quantile (α = 1%, very low risk exposure), (20) infinite storage 4 . Each of these scenarios corresponds to a different strategy that the wind producer may follow for hedging wind power forecast uncertainty.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to balancing market prices, no survey exists to our knowledge. However, case studies exist, including Skytte [19], Fleten and Pettersen [9],Olsson and Söder [17], Jaehnert et al [12], Brolin and Söder [2] and Boomsma et al [1] -all of them from the Nordic market. The contribution of this article is a systematic review and benchmarking of time series based methods for balancing market price forecasting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there will be no model that suits all balancing price processes. This explains why Skytte [39] finds that the balancing price can be explained by the dayahead market price, while Jaehnert et al [40] results indicate no correlation between the spot and balancing prices. Jaehnert et al [40] model the balancing price as the difference to the day-ahead market price, while both Olsson and Soder [41] and Klaeboe et al [42] model it directly including correlation with the spot price.…”
Section: Balancing Pricementioning
confidence: 96%