2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12667-013-0103-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking time series based forecasting models for electricity balancing market prices

Abstract: In the trade-off between bidding in the day-ahead electricity market and the real time balancing market, producers need good forecasts for balancing market prices to make informed decisions. A range of earlier published models for forecasting of balancing market prices, including a few extensions, is benchmarked. The models are benchmarked both for one hour-ahead and dayahead forecast, and both point and interval forecasts are compared. None of the benchmarked models produce informative day-ahead point forecas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains why Skytte [39] finds that the balancing price can be explained by the dayahead market price, while Jaehnert et al [40] results indicate no correlation between the spot and balancing prices. Jaehnert et al [40] model the balancing price as the difference to the day-ahead market price, while both Olsson and Soder [41] and Klaeboe et al [42] model it directly including correlation with the spot price.…”
Section: Balancing Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains why Skytte [39] finds that the balancing price can be explained by the dayahead market price, while Jaehnert et al [40] results indicate no correlation between the spot and balancing prices. Jaehnert et al [40] model the balancing price as the difference to the day-ahead market price, while both Olsson and Soder [41] and Klaeboe et al [42] model it directly including correlation with the spot price.…”
Section: Balancing Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nordic BM is characterized by a) marginal price settlement: price is set by the marginal cost of the last activated unit, b) hourly settlement resolution, c) dual imbalance pricing scheme: BM price is paid only to the balance responsible players that actively help the restoration of the system balance and d) price cap/floor: DA market prices act as an upper/lower limit to the BM prices [8]. There are three main possible balancing states depending on the direction of the balancing power needed each hour: 1) no regulation state, when consumption equals production, 2) upward regulation state, when consumption exceeds production, and 3) downward regulation state, when production exceeds consumption.…”
Section: Using Hmm For Balancing Market Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a highly cited model [6] which uses a combination of a Markov switching state model to predict the state of the BM and a SARIMA model to predict the value of the BM prices. Here a modification of this model is used which combines elements of the models presented in [18] and [8].…”
Section: A the Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, we now highlight samples of statistical approaches for load forecasting from the recent literature, focusing on achieved accuracy and limitations for purposes of scenario generation. Similarly, forecasting models for wholesale market prices have been assessed for their suitability in generating scenarios [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%