2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Regional Returns of Public Investment Policies in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found that the contribution of public investments is significant in the priority provinces, but not significant in the non-priority provinces. One explanation is that public investments in the developed non-priority provinces may be in health and education rather than infrastructure, and therefore their effect may not be observed immediately (see Rodriguez-Oreggia and Rodriguez-Pose, 2004, for similar findings in the developed regions of Mexico).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that the contribution of public investments is significant in the priority provinces, but not significant in the non-priority provinces. One explanation is that public investments in the developed non-priority provinces may be in health and education rather than infrastructure, and therefore their effect may not be observed immediately (see Rodriguez-Oreggia and Rodriguez-Pose, 2004, for similar findings in the developed regions of Mexico).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agrarian policies shifted in the period 1988-1994 to trade liberalization of agricultural products, reduction of credit, promotion of private enterprise in the agricultural sector, and scaling down of public institutions (including agricultural credit, extension, insurance, inputs, transport, storage and marketing). As part of the neo-liberal reforms, in 1991 Article 27 of the Mexican constitution was revised to permit privatization of communal owned land, aiming to stimulate private investment in rural areas (Kay 1995;Lachler and Aschauer 1998;Rodriguez and Rodríguez 2004;Vargas-Hernández 2005;Eakin 2005). As a consequence of these changes, small farmers are adapting and changing towards livelihood strategies outside the agricultural sector, as exemplified by the rise in international migration (Emanuel and Greenberg 2000;Eakin 2005;).…”
Section: Home Gardens: Challenges and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this centralization of tax collection authority could ostensibly enable transfers across territories and people, states were guaranteed resources similar to their historical tax collection, and the allocation formulas predominantly weighted population and economic activity in the states. This meant that although fiscal transfers increased during the 1980s, transfers were not progressive (Rodríguez-Oreggia and Rodríguez-Pose 2004).…”
Section: Legislative Barriers To Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%