2013
DOI: 10.1162/jinh_a_00574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Real Little Ice Age

Abstract: The Little Ice Age is not a dogma. It is an increasingly firm consensus backed by considerable evidence across a variety of sources. To disprove it, or even to call it into question, would mean finding systematic errors in several types of proxy data. Kelly and Ó Gráda have not cleared any of these hurdles, or even come close. The refutation of their arguments demonstrates just how strong the evidence for the Little Ice Age has become and just how important it is for historians to take it seriously.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Kelly and Gráda () contend that there was no decrease in temperature during the late middle ages. However, their argument remains contested by climate scientists and historians (Büntgen and Hellmann, ; White, ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Kelly and Gráda () contend that there was no decrease in temperature during the late middle ages. However, their argument remains contested by climate scientists and historians (Büntgen and Hellmann, ; White, ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kelly and Gr ada (2014) contend that there was no decrease in temperature during the late middle ages. However, their argument remains contested by climate scientists and historians(B€ untgen and Hellmann, 2014;White, 2014).54 Whether Erasmus's anti-Judaism is sufficiently virulent to represent antisemitism is a subject of scholarly debate(Markish, 1986).© 2015 Royal Economic Society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we appreciate the rhetorical value of this approach, its simplicity does not engage with the complexity of our evidence. Indeed, it resembles the way climate history used to be written in the early decades of the discipline, from the 1960s onward, when Hubert Lamb, Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, and others promoted notions such as the "Medieval Warm Period" and the "Little Ice Age" (Lamb, 1965;Le Roy Ladurie, 1961, 1967)-and it is worth noting that this approach is currently being abandoned, with the Medieval Climate Optimum being redefined into an "anomaly" and the Little Ice Age now contested as a coherent phenomenon in the Earth's recent climate history (Büntgen & Hellmann, 2013;Holsinger, 2017;Kelly & Ó Gráda, 2013, 2014White, 2013;Xoplaki et al, 2016).…”
Section: A Climate In Doubtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stages are characterized by environmental changes since 1600 expressed in the n-alkane distributions and MAAT reconstruction (Figure 4). The stages seem to be a consequence of the LIA, in which the Earth became, on average, slightly colder [2]. The existence of three episodes of the LIA is generally accepted: at around 1600, 1770 and 1850, each separated by slight warming intervals [12], although the worldwide effects of might differ in time and magnitude.…”
Section: Maat and Vegetation Cover Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period is divided into two phases; the first was around 1300 until the late 1400s and the second warmer period was in in the 1500s [2]. The period between 1600 and 1850 marks its height and was characterized by changes in the hydrological cycle and perturbation of the ecosystem [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%