2021
DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s297838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Abstract: Purpose Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately. Patients and Methods Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct the pressure ulcer prediction models, respectively. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the results are in line with those of Song et al (2021) who also established that the Random Forest model has a higher accuracy when compared to other models (20). In the study, Song et al (2021) built and tested machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event in order to find an optimal model which accurately predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcers (20). The models used to predict the occurrence of pressure ulcer are support vector machine, decision tree model, artificial neural network model, and random forest model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lastly, the results are in line with those of Song et al (2021) who also established that the Random Forest model has a higher accuracy when compared to other models (20). In the study, Song et al (2021) built and tested machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event in order to find an optimal model which accurately predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcers (20). The models used to predict the occurrence of pressure ulcer are support vector machine, decision tree model, artificial neural network model, and random forest model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, relationships between 72 h URVs and the variables may not be linear; therefore, adopting a nonlinear model was necessary. RF was used in our study because it is a robust classifier that is widely used [ 30 , 31 ]. XGB was also introduced in our study because of favorable performance with imbalanced data due to autoregulating class weight during training [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Moreover, compared with visual detection, our model can improve the accuracy of pressure injury diagnosis to a certain extent. 41 This study has limitations. First, data were obtained from two hospitals, and the results may not be applicable to other patient groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A detection threshold of 0·88 indicates that the proposed model can assist in the clinical diagnosis of pressure injuries 22 . Moreover, compared with visual detection, our model can improve the accuracy of pressure injury diagnosis to a certain extent 41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%