2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(99)00282-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The qualitative and quantitative determination of quinolones of first and second generation by capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 CE proved to be an important tool in the analysis of FQ derivatives but the large majority of the developed methods describe separation of FQs from different generations having different physicochemical characteristics. [4][5][6][7][8] Ciprofloxacin (CIP), norfloxacin (NOR) and ofloxacin (OFL) (three 2 nd generation FQs) are by far the important and widely used FQs. CIP and NOR have almost similar structural characteristics, the substituent at the nitrogen atom from the pyridin-carboxilic ring (cyclopropyl and ethyl side chain, respectively) being the only difference between the two, while OFL is a tricyclic derivative and has a methyl substituent on the piperazine ring ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 CE proved to be an important tool in the analysis of FQ derivatives but the large majority of the developed methods describe separation of FQs from different generations having different physicochemical characteristics. [4][5][6][7][8] Ciprofloxacin (CIP), norfloxacin (NOR) and ofloxacin (OFL) (three 2 nd generation FQs) are by far the important and widely used FQs. CIP and NOR have almost similar structural characteristics, the substituent at the nitrogen atom from the pyridin-carboxilic ring (cyclopropyl and ethyl side chain, respectively) being the only difference between the two, while OFL is a tricyclic derivative and has a methyl substituent on the piperazine ring ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Some CE methods have been developed for the determination of CIP, NOR and OFL, but their simultaneous determination is challenging because of their similar electrophoretic mobilities. 6,7 The aim of our study was to prove the applicability of the CE method for the simultaneous separation of the studied FQs by developing a rapid, simple and sensitive procedure for their simultaneous determination and also to conduct a systematic study of the analytical conditions (i.e., the effects of buffer concentration, modifier concentration and buffer pH) in order to improve the separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 It is determined by capillary electrophoresis, [8][9][10] polarography, 11 voltammetry, 12 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 13 spectrofluorimetry, 14,15 and chemiluminescence. 16,17 Among these techniques CL method combined with flow injection is well known as the powerful analytical technique that provides the advantages of simple equipment, high sensitivity detection and producing low background signals for the emission of CL coming from the chemical reaction. However, a few flow injection CL methods were reported for the determination of NFLX in pharmaceutical and biological samples with different reaction systems such as, Au nanoparticles (NPs)-NFLX-Ce(IV)-Na 2 SO 3 system, 18 [Ag(HIO 6 21 CL reaction of sulphite with Ce(IV) sensitized by NFLX, 22 micelle-sensitized Ce(IV)-Na 2 S 2 O 3 -NFLX system, 23 FQs-soluble manganese (IV)-sulphite system, 24 FQs-Ru(bipy) 3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, Sun and Wu, 9 achieved the separation of 7 FQs using sodium borate/ sodium dihydrogen phosphate/ sodium cholate/ acetonitrile within 8.5 min of electrolyte running. Finally, Fierens et al 10 performed partial separation of 10 quinolones and FQs at about 14 min using sodium phosphate buffer (pH ≈ 7). Additionally, the reviews published by Flurer describing recent advances in the analysis of antibiotics by CE, among which the FQs, presented an overview about the determination of this kind of pharmaceutical in different matrixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology, in comparison with others previously described in the literature for the analysis of FQs pharmaceutical formulations, presents the analysis of more recent FQs such as GTLFX and MFLX, shorter analysis time and simpler reagents in the background electrolyte. [8][9][10] Table 1 shows the excipients present in each tablet analyzed. The presence of these makes the use of a selective method necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%