The Public Hearing as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism: A Case Study of the General Revenue Sharing Program

Abstract

Students of citizen participation in public affairs disagree as to the effectiveness of such citizen involvement. Using the General Revenue Sharing program as a case study and applying techniques of both cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, this article examines the effectiveness of one form of citizen participation, the public hearing. It is found that in the revenue-sharing program, the public hearing did have an immediate, but only short-term, impact on levels of public interest and citizen involvement. Evidence to support some short-term and some long-term effects on reported expenditure decisions is presented; however, these impacts generally are found to be inconsequential and not statistically significant. It is concluded that, as a form of citizen participation, the public hearing—at least as demonstrated in the General Revenue Sharing program—has not had much of an impact on citizen behavior or policy choices.

Pressure groups and Australian health policymaking in the 1980s

“…These strengths were most evident in older organizations, which also had developed effective information/communication networks essential to furthering their interests. The importance of an organization's economic status for ensuring effectiveness of pressure group strategies has often been observed (Hansen 1985;Cole and Caputo 1984;Cooper 1979), with its obvious social class-based bias in favor of resourcerich social groups (Keeter and Zukin 1983).…”

The public hearing process: A tool for citizen participation, or a path toward citizen alienation?

“…decision making process." 11 Cole and Caputo chose the general revenue sharing (GRS) program as a model for analyzing the public hearing process, for a number of reasons. First, given the number of participants, they noted that "GRS represents the most extensive federal grant program incorporating the public hearing process ever enacted and offers a unique opportunity to assess the impact of the public hearing as a form of direct citizen involvement."…”

Participatory environmental governance in China: Public hearings on urban water tariff setting

“…Public hearing is one of the oldest and most widely applied arrangements to let citizens participate in governance in Western Countries (Checkoway, 1981). There it was originally applied in judicial processes ('judicial hearing') and gradually expanded to legislative and administrative processes ('legislative hearing' and 'administrative hearing') respectively (Checkoway and Van Til, 1980;Cole and Caputo, 1984). Since 1996, China started to experiment with Western arrangements of public hearings, first on administrative penalties in 1996 and then also on pricing.…”