1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.1988.tb00472.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychology of Reciprocity in International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-existing images create stereotyped expectations, and influence negotiation behavior. They also pose obstacles to the correct interpretation of the motives behind an opponent's action (Larson, 1988;Rubin and Brown, 1975 p. 131). Failure to appreciate the cultural patterns of your fellow negotiator makes it difficult to predict that negotiator's future decisions.…”
Section: Culture and International Negotiationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pre-existing images create stereotyped expectations, and influence negotiation behavior. They also pose obstacles to the correct interpretation of the motives behind an opponent's action (Larson, 1988;Rubin and Brown, 1975 p. 131). Failure to appreciate the cultural patterns of your fellow negotiator makes it difficult to predict that negotiator's future decisions.…”
Section: Culture and International Negotiationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is difficult to develop cooperation if power between states is imbalanced because more powerful states do not fear the adversary's retaliation (Rubin and Brown 1975;Zartman 1997;Goldstein et al 2001). Third, it is difficult to change the image of the enemy, and international cooperation does not easily evolve even with reciprocal strategies (Larson 1988;Tetlock 1998 ;Goldstein et al 2001). Fourth, when cooperative initiatives are absent, reciprocity might become "locked in"-but locked in on mutual competition or "defection" that generates an endless arms race (Patchen 1987, 176;Goldstein et al 2001,591).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the other side's prior action on the actor's expectations will depend on how cooperative or conflictive the action is interpreted as being and what it is seen as indicating about the other's objectives and intentions (Coddington, 1968;Snyder and Diesing, 1977;Larson, 1988). An actor does not consider the absolute nature of the other's action (e.g., how cooperative or conflictive it is) in isolation from other actions by both sides.…”
Section: Prior Actions Of Othermentioning
confidence: 97%