The Effect of US Foreign Policy on the Relationship Between South and North Korea: Time Series Analysis of the Post-Cold War Era

Yoon, Jong-Han

doi:10.1017/s1598240800007189

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The approach is consistent with event data research on disputes such as the Balkans conflicts and the Israel-Palestinian conflicts (Pevehouse and Goldstein 1999;Schrodt and Gerner 2000;Shellman 2006). It is also consistent with at least one other event data paper on North Korea (Yoon 2011). For this article, I use new data collected on US-ROK JMEs from 1998 through 2010.…”

Section: Datasupporting

confidence: 73%

War Games: North Korea'S Reaction to US and South Korean Military Exercises

D’Orazio¹

2012

Journal of East Asian Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Datasupporting

confidence: 73%

War Games: North Korea'S Reaction to US and South Korean Military Exercises

D’Orazio¹

2012

Journal of East Asian Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Foreign policy of the United States to respond to North Korea gives the impact to solve the problem in the Korean Peninsula. However, the domestic political condition of South Korea has a significant effect in affecting relations between those three countries (Yoon, 2011). Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland, 2007 The significant role of South Korea for the US and North Korea could be assessed in some regimes in South Korea.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 1980 and 1990, several social movements had come and reflected South Korea's independent characteristics to determine their own policy. They had a considerable influence on South Korea's condition and position in international, regional and domestic areas (Zhu, 2007).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this regard, the two Presidents Kim Dae Jung and Roh Moo Hyun agreed to reduce the increasing anti-United States tension in South Korea. The two presidents stated that the United States is South Korea's main alliance (Zhu, 2007). The progressive regime made some compromises while maintaining some cooperation with the United States in the midst of the development anti-American movement in South Korea.…”

Section: The Regime Strategy Of Progressive and Conservative Group Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Influence of Domestic Politics of South Korea on its Relations with North Korea and the United States

Darussalam

2020

JSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to conduct research on the influence of domestic South Korean politics on relations with the United States and North Korea. In this case, the theory of dominance of domestic political actors explains where the dominance of a group will have an influence on determining the foreign policy of a country. South Korea’s domestic politics is dominated by two groups with different ideologies in the face of the United States and North Korea. This then resulted in different actions in the face of North Korea and the United States. The differences will be explained by assessing some of the policies applied to Kim Dae Jung’s regime and Roh Moo-Hyun from a progressive group. The policy will then be compared to the policies of the regime of Lee Myung Bak from conservative groups. Differences in the group’s dominant views in South Korea have led to certain strategies for each group in the face of the opposition group. The strategy is carried out to maintain the effectiveness of the policies applied according to the ideology of each group. This research used literature study as the method by taking data from journals and reports which that discuss the national politics of South Korea. The theoretical framework of V.M Hudson, which focuses on the national circumstances, and the role of domestic actors have been applied in this research.

show abstract

“…19 Namun saat pertumbuhan ekonomi Jepang berhasil mengalahkan Barat dari proses pembangunan sebelumnya, pembaruan tersebut tidak menampakkan kemampuan melakukan rekayasa sosial, sekalipun berhasil menempatkan Jepang dalam jajaran negara-negara maju. 20 Demikian pula rezim pasca perang di Taiwan 21 dan Korea, 22 demi mempertahankan persekutuan dengan Amerika Serikat, 23 bersedia mempertahankan konstitusionalisme formal. Pengadilan dibiarkan bebas, sekalipun aktivitas hakim amat berhati-hati.…”

Section: B Legitimasi Dan Kontrol Aparaturunclassified

Kinerja Pengadilan dalam Lingkaran Kekuasaan Otoritarian

Isharyanto

2019

UJH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to describe socio-juridically the performance of courts in authoritarian circles of power. The court is increasingly demanded attention by academics of constitutional law, along with the expectation of a role in the presence of power. Courts, of course by involving judicial apparatus, especially judges, are controlled by the executive but are able to negotiate their functions to support the government. Courts can provide legitimacy both internally and externally as well as being an effective tool for maintaining power. On this side, every regime of power has an interest of the court. Therefore, the idealita of the court then also related with independence, which is not only for the rule of law, constitutionality and human rights, but also in relation to globalization, free and efficient economic activities. If the judges are independent, they are basically protected from undue influence from those who can damage their impartiality. With variations that are not the same, but working in the same circle of power, courts in Singapore and Pakistan confirm these matters. Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan secara sosio yuridis kinerja pengadilan dalam lingkaran kekuasaan yang otoritarian. Pengadilan semakin dituntut perhatiannya oleh akademisi hukum tata negara, seiring harapan akan peran di hadapan kekuasaan. Pengadilan, tentu saja dengan melibatkan aparatur peradilan, terutama hakim, dikendalikan eksekutif akan tetapi mampu menempatkan negosiasi fungsi mereka untuk mendukung pemerintah. Pengadilan bisa memberikan legitimasi secara internal maupun eksternal sekaligus menjadi alat efektif untuk mempertahankan kekuasaan. Pada sisi ini, setiap rezim kekuasaan berkepentingan dengan pengadilan. Oleh sebab itu, idealita pengadilan kemudian juga berurusan dengan independensi, yang tidak hanya untuk supremasi hukum, konstitusionalitas, dan hak asasi manusia, tetapi juga dalam kaitannya dengan globalisasi, kegiatan ekonomi yang bebas, dan efisien. Jika hakim independen, mereka pada dasarnya dilindungi dari pengaruh yang tidak semestinya dari pihak-pihak yang dapat merusak ketidakberpihakan mereka. Dengan variasi yang tidak sama, namun bekerja dalam lingkaran kekuasaan yang sama, pengadilan di Singapura dan Pakistan memberikan konfirmasi atas hal-hal tersebut.

show abstract

The Effect of US Foreign Policy on the Relationship Between South and North Korea: Time Series Analysis of the Post-Cold War Era

Abstract: In this study, I examine the effect

Cited by 6 publications

References 21 publications

War Games: North Korea'S Reaction to US and South Korean Military Exercises

War Games: North Korea'S Reaction to US and South Korean Military Exercises

The Influence of Domestic Politics of South Korea on its Relations with North Korea and the United States

Kinerja Pengadilan dalam Lingkaran Kekuasaan Otoritarian

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About