2015
DOI: 10.1080/1047840x.2015.959094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Process of Emotion Regulation Is Different From Individual Differences in Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Arguments and a Focus on Individual Differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their moral autonomy and prosocial behaviors are clearly improved according to the judgments issued by the students; this is in line with results from Diaz and Eisenberg (2015) and Musitu and García (2016) when studying the acquisition of this process. Furthermore, these variables validate the model and habits variable, introduced as a contribution from this study in the reasoned action methodology (Otero, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Their moral autonomy and prosocial behaviors are clearly improved according to the judgments issued by the students; this is in line with results from Diaz and Eisenberg (2015) and Musitu and García (2016) when studying the acquisition of this process. Furthermore, these variables validate the model and habits variable, introduced as a contribution from this study in the reasoned action methodology (Otero, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In formulating this model, we also use this opportunity to incorporate recent advances in the broader emotion regulation field (Gross, 2015a) into alexithymia theory, because we believe these advances might provide a useful theoretical framework for conceptualising alexithymia. We specifically use Gross's (2015a) recently introduced extended process model of emotion regulation as a framework for our model of alexithymia, because many authors consider it to be at the forefront of emotion regulation theory and it has been successfully applied to a multitude of emotional phenomena (e.g., Aldao & Christensen, 2015;Diaz & Eisenberg, 2015;Giuliani & Berkman, 2015;Kuppens & Verduyn, 2015;Schmader & Mendes, 2015). Within this framework, we also seek to integrate Lane and Schwartz's (1987) cognitive-developmental theory of levels of emotional awareness.…”
Section: And the Toronto Structuredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this theoretical consistency, child development research rarely captures the dynamic, systemic nature of regulation and its development (e.g., Cole, Martin, & Dennis, ). Commonly used questionnaires and observational methods focus on static individual differences, not on self‐regulation as a process (Diaz & Eisenberg, ). Evidence indicates that well‐adjusted, socially competent children display less negative emotion or misbehavior than other children, suggesting that they self‐regulate more successfully.…”
Section: The Development Of Self‐regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%