2019
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of clinically meaningful malocclusion among US adults

Abstract: Objective The primary purpose of this study was to statistically evaluate age, ethnic and sex differences in the prevalence of clinically meaningful malocclusions among adults. Setting and Sample Population A random sample of 8804 untreated US adults between 17 and 46 years of age was selected from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Materials & Methods Three ethnic (non‐Hispanic White, non‐Hispanic Black and Mexican Americans) and three age (17‐26, 27‐36 and 37‐46 years) groups we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of malocclusion can vary between children and adolescents. However, the demand for orthodontic treatment is increasing [43][44][45], and greater attention has to be paid to periodontal aspects; indeed, orthodontic treatment can play an important role in periodontal changes [46]. The thickness of the gingiva is supposed to represent an indicator for reducing the risk of bone loss and gingival recession [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of malocclusion can vary between children and adolescents. However, the demand for orthodontic treatment is increasing [43][44][45], and greater attention has to be paid to periodontal aspects; indeed, orthodontic treatment can play an important role in periodontal changes [46]. The thickness of the gingiva is supposed to represent an indicator for reducing the risk of bone loss and gingival recession [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of malocclusion is evaluated to be approximately 39.5–76% [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] in adult patients, comprising 74.7% of class I, 19.56% of class II and 5.93% of class III malocclusion worldwide. In the group of mixed dentition patients, distribution of these malocclusions was 73%, 23% and 4%, respectively [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental malocclusions are still prevalent in the world’s population, and one of the recommended treatments relies on the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel to correct tooth positioning [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The drawback with this fixing orthodontic strategy, however, is that it favors biofilm accumulation, and limits oral self-cleaning mechanisms and the patient’s ability for effective removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%