2002
DOI: 10.1177/108118002129172458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Press and Reform in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of the community structural pluralism model (e.g., Demers, 1996; Hindman et al, 1999; Hindman & Yamamoto, 2011), members of larger, more structurally pluralistic prefectures reported lower levels of media trust. Given skewed media representation of socio-cultural diversity identified by prior mass communication and journalism research both in the United States and Japan (e.g., Krauss, 2000; Krauss & Lambert, 2002; Prieler et al, 2009), structurally pluralistic environments where diverse socio-cultural activities and relationships as well as intergroup conflict are more or less expected seem to cultivate socially structured standards regarding media content (Sampson & Wilson, 1998).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In support of the community structural pluralism model (e.g., Demers, 1996; Hindman et al, 1999; Hindman & Yamamoto, 2011), members of larger, more structurally pluralistic prefectures reported lower levels of media trust. Given skewed media representation of socio-cultural diversity identified by prior mass communication and journalism research both in the United States and Japan (e.g., Krauss, 2000; Krauss & Lambert, 2002; Prieler et al, 2009), structurally pluralistic environments where diverse socio-cultural activities and relationships as well as intergroup conflict are more or less expected seem to cultivate socially structured standards regarding media content (Sampson & Wilson, 1998).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are informed by research on political heterogeneity (e.g., Scheufele et al, 2006). While political heterogeneity presents the opportunities to encounter different political viewpoints, and exposure to political difference fosters a politically informed citizenry, the literature indicates that political coverage of Japanese media is limited in terms of representing diverse ideas and perspectives (Hagiwara et al, 2000; Krauss & Lambert, 2002). Such discrepancies may lead individuals in more politically heterogeneous areas to question the quality of media coverage of politics and cultivate mistrustful attitudes toward the media.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 We selected these newspapers because of their market domination, national status and influence. They have the largest circulations and produce more national, international and public affairs reporting than regional newspapers (Krauss and Lambert, 2002;Sugiyama, 2000). Their combined circulations (over 20 million) indicate their influence as chief agenda setters (Krauss, 2000;Hall, 1998).…”
Section: Newspaper Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And if the media environment increasingly fails to educate – by failing to provide accurate, alternative and actionable political information to that which is provided by the state – a central premise of liberal democracy is undermined. Ample questions have been asked about the balance and independence of the Japanese media (e.g., Nester, 1989; Farley, 1996; Freeman, 2000; Krauss and Lambert, 2002; Gamble and Watanabe, 2004; Otopalik and Schaefer, 2008). Few have focused squarely on how it impacts on what Japanese know about their political system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%