1968
DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.18.6.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Present Status of Mammary Thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10] First studies in women with breast cancer showed a mean sensitivity and specificity of 90% of the thermography. [11][12][13][14] Thermography has a sensitivity of 83% in detecting breast cancer in women and thermography associated with mammography has a sensitivity of 95%. 8,15,16 Mammary tumors in dogs are commonly diagnosed by palpation of the mammary gland without complementary exams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] First studies in women with breast cancer showed a mean sensitivity and specificity of 90% of the thermography. [11][12][13][14] Thermography has a sensitivity of 83% in detecting breast cancer in women and thermography associated with mammography has a sensitivity of 95%. 8,15,16 Mammary tumors in dogs are commonly diagnosed by palpation of the mammary gland without complementary exams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Central Statistical Unit, all of this material was edited, coded, punched on IBM cards, and loaded on to magnetic tape to form a unit record for each patient enrolled in the study. Table 1 shows the total number of patients (3,518) enrolled in the study and the number for whom each procedure was done at each hospital. In a few cases, the physical examination was not done, and the information could not be obtained from the hospital records.…”
Section: Methods Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 Approximately 3,000 thermography clinics were operating in the US during this time. No hotspot image was detected in the left breast.…”
Section: Feasibility Of New-generation Infrared Imaging Screening Formentioning
confidence: 99%