1969
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(196912)24:6<1206::aid-cncr2820240624>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of thermography in the detection of breast cancer.A cooperative pilot study

Abstract: A collaborative study of 3,518 patients in several medical centers was designed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of thermography as compared to mammographic and clinical examinations. For 862 patients who had breast surgery or a biopsy, the sensitivity and specificity was 0.823 and 0.784 respectively for physical examinations, 0.721 and 0.798 for thermographic reading with clinical data, and 0.703 and 0.807 for mammography. Of additional interest was the observation that each of the procedures (phy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is questionable as to whether this category should be located between Grades 3 and 4 or between Grades 2 and 3, as mammographic diagnosis is markedly more sensitive than physical examination. Accordingly, and in conjunction with Lilienfeld et al, 3 this category was included in Grade 4 depending on one diagnostic modality only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is questionable as to whether this category should be located between Grades 3 and 4 or between Grades 2 and 3, as mammographic diagnosis is markedly more sensitive than physical examination. Accordingly, and in conjunction with Lilienfeld et al, 3 this category was included in Grade 4 depending on one diagnostic modality only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%