1998
DOI: 10.2307/2991916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Postabortion Caseload in Egyptian Hospitals: A Descriptive Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The clinical criteria were later tested and adapted by researchers in South Africa who proposed using only women's symptoms, as observed by their providers, to categorise low, moderate and high severity complications (Table 1). 18 The methodology has been used to classify cases using a retrospective medical record review 10,11,25 and for prospective use by researchers in South Africa, [17][18][19][20][21][22] Kenya 23 and now in Cambodia. In South Africa, the study was conducted twice in a 4-year period to document changes in abortion-related morbidity due to legalisation of terminations in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The clinical criteria were later tested and adapted by researchers in South Africa who proposed using only women's symptoms, as observed by their providers, to categorise low, moderate and high severity complications (Table 1). 18 The methodology has been used to classify cases using a retrospective medical record review 10,11,25 and for prospective use by researchers in South Africa, [17][18][19][20][21][22] Kenya 23 and now in Cambodia. In South Africa, the study was conducted twice in a 4-year period to document changes in abortion-related morbidity due to legalisation of terminations in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The technical and clinical interventions needed to provide safe, accessible and high quality abortion and menstrual regulation services are well known and include using vacuum aspiration or medication abortion instead of dilation and curettage for uterine evacuation; providing services in outpatient facilities, rather than in operating theaters; having midlevel providers instead of specialists provide care; and providing contraceptive counseling and services. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Each of these interventions has been shown to reduce the cost of care at the individual, facility or health system levels. 9,12,15,[17][18][19][20][21] Despite the advantages of these interventions in terms of safety and cost, they are often not implemented or are used inconsistently, preventing measurement of costs of services at facility or health system levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicator is highly correlated with maternal mortality levels, although such a correlation does not provide levels of causality (6).…”
Section: Usementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Where estimates can be reliably produced at a subnational level, these may help to set priorities. For example, a ratio of 50-250 per 100 000 may point to problems of quality of care for labour/delivery, while higher ratios (>250) may suggest problems of access as well (6).…”
Section: Usementioning
confidence: 99%