The politicization of research methods, illustrated in the case of plant closures

Abstract

This paper contributes to building better methods in economic geography by examining the coevolution of theory, methodology, and should read methodology, and the practice of research methods with the policy context. The paper suggests that debates about how economic geography defines its theoretical and methodological boundaries have not been sufficiently cognizant of the effects of policy engagement. It posits that the politicized contemporary context is aligning research practices to policy constituencies, reshaping research questions, altering the criteria of research validity, increasing the division between qualitative and quantitative approaches, and solidifying divisions between different sub-branches of the discipline. This process is illustrated by way of a genealogy of studies of plant closures. The conclusion links these changes to questions about the future of the discipline.

Stylised facts and close dialogue redux

“…Rice (2010) stressed the need to acknowledge and negotiate the power relations in elite interviews while Faulconbridge (2012) suggested that close dialogue was a useful method for studying power relations. Weller (2020) discussed privacy, disclosure and ever-stricter research ethics protocols as challenges facing access to key informants and close dialogue.…”