2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jmte.0000021943.35739.1c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Middle School, Mathematics Teachers in China and the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
179
0
34

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
179
0
34
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, Shulman (1987) has examined pedagogical content knowledge as consisting of two components: student knowledge and teaching strategies. Examining of components of the knowledge to understand students in various different pedagogical content knowledge models shows that An, Wu and Kulm (2004) divided student knowledge into such sub-categories as addressing students' misconceptions, knowing students' thinking, building on students' maths ideas, engaging students in math learning, and promoting students' thinking mathematics. Schoenfeld (1998) discussed student knowledge in sub-categories such as students' knowledge of what they understood, misconceptions in the topic area and students' prior knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this framework, Shulman (1987) has examined pedagogical content knowledge as consisting of two components: student knowledge and teaching strategies. Examining of components of the knowledge to understand students in various different pedagogical content knowledge models shows that An, Wu and Kulm (2004) divided student knowledge into such sub-categories as addressing students' misconceptions, knowing students' thinking, building on students' maths ideas, engaging students in math learning, and promoting students' thinking mathematics. Schoenfeld (1998) discussed student knowledge in sub-categories such as students' knowledge of what they understood, misconceptions in the topic area and students' prior knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the studies carried out are examined (Grossman, 1990;Fennema and Franke, 1992;Schoenfeld, 1998;Magnusson et al, 1999;An, Kulm and Wu, 2004;Ball et al, 2008;Park and Oliver, 2008;Kovarik, 2008;Hacıömeroglu, 2009;Baştürk, 2009;Yeşildere and Akkoç, 2010;BukovaGüzel, 2010), it is seen that the number of studies examining the subject of quadrilaterals in terms of pedagogical content knowledge is fairly low. The aim of this study is to examine middle school mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in terms of student knowledge regarding quadrilaterals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCK has been considered as the most important component in identifying the role of the teacher in carrying out effective teaching (Ann, Kulm & Wu, 2004;Ball, 1990;Magnusson, Borko & Krajik, 1999;Nilsson, 2008), and many researchers have conducted studies in order to comprehend PCK (Ball, Thames & Phelps, 2008;Grossman, 1990;Hashweh, 2005;Loughran, 2006;Magnusson et al, 1999;Shulman, 1986Shulman, , 1987Van Driel, Verloop & de Vos, 1998). Shulman (1986) divides PCK in two components as "students understanding" and "instructional strategies and representations".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, Shulman (1987) has examined pedagogical content knowledge as consisting of two components: student knowledge and teaching strategies. When components of the knowledge to understand students in various different pedagogical content knowledge models are examined (Grossman, 1990;Fennema and Franke, 1992;Schoenfeld, 1998;Magnusson et al, 1999;An et al, 2004;Ball et al, 2008;Park and Oliver, 2008;Kovarik, 2008) it is observed that student knowledge is examined in six different sub-components such as revealing the current knowledge of students, associating preliminary knowledge with new knowledge, valuing *Corresponding author. E-mail: elifnurakdogan@hotmail.com Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License student questions and thoughts, taking into consideration the individual differences, predicting student thought and determining-knowing the misconceptions of students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When teaching the topics, the awareness of the teachers of these strategies, the usage of them appropriately and the pedagogical content knowledge are effective in terms of teaching strategies component. When the studies carried out are examined (Grossman, 1990;Fennema and Franke, 1992;Schoenfeld, 1998;Magnusson et al, 1999;An et al, 2004;Ball et al, 2008;Park and Oliver, 2008;Kovarik, 2008;Hacıomeroglu, 2009;Basturk, 2009;Yesildere and Akkoc, 2010;Bukova-Guzel, 2010) it is seen that the number of studies examining the subject of quadrilaterals in terms of pedagogical content knowledge is fairly low. The aim of this study is to examine middle school mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge regarding teaching strategies on quadrilaterals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%