“…Studies grapple with issues such as the support, empowerment and opportunity they provide/do not provide (Haugh and Laschinger, 1996;Almost and Spence-Laschinger, 2002;Tourangeau et al, 2009), or their social functioning and what makes them psychologically healthy or unhealthy (Leveck and Jones, 1996;Dendaas, 2004Dendaas, , 2010Lavoie-Tremblay et al, 2008;Vessey et al, 2009), or how their architecture and design features can impact care and outcomes (Williams, 2001;Parker et al, 2004;Becker, 2007;Marquardt and Schmieg, 2009). Similarly, nursing environment has also emerged in discussions of leadership capacity, such as settings for practice enhancement and development strategies (McCormack and McCance, 2011;McCormack et al, 2013), as 'contexts' -with political, economic and social variability -that help or hinder research knowledge translation (Kitson et al, 1998;Rycroft-Malone, 2004;Rycroft-Malone et al, 2013) and in specific forms as high performing and attractive 'magnet' institutions (Scott et al, 1999;Buchan, 1999;Upenieks, 2003). Continuing this latter theme, nursing environment has also been mobilised in debates on the 'best places' to care, as in the case of institutionalized settings versus homes (West et al, 2000;Watty et al, 2003;Parratt and Fahy, 2004), and through debates on the nature and importance of physical proximity and presence in caring interactions and relationships (Osterman and Schwartz-Barcott, 1996;Melnechenko, 2003;MacKinnon et al, 2005), particularly given the emergence of nursing in cyberspace in the last two decades (Hern et al, 1997;Cudney and Weinert, 2000).…”