1976
DOI: 10.1137/0130006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optimal Partitioning of Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This graph has 40 nodes and ml = m2 = 20. Two sets C1 and C2 of edge costs are given in [5]. The underlying graph is 3-regular.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This graph has 40 nodes and ml = m2 = 20. Two sets C1 and C2 of edge costs are given in [5]. The underlying graph is 3-regular.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also point out that the bound from theorem 5.1 in quite competitive with the subgradient improved bound from lemma 5.3 for the variants V2 and V3. The optimal solution values are from [5]. Table 6 Three variants of a 40-node graph.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Christofides and Brooker [2] consider the case of bipartitioning the nodes with unit weights, while Rendl and Wolkowicz [7] consider the special case with unit node weights and a specific number of nodes in each class. Graph partitioning problems with no limit on the number of classes (free partitions) have been studied by Faigle et al [3] and Lukes [5].…”
Section: Partition the Set Of Nodes In At Most P Classes Such That Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first exact algorithm using branch and bound techniques for solving the optimal bipartition problem (i. e. the special case where p = 2) can be found in Christofides and Brooker (1976). Much more recently, Hansen and Roucairol (1987) showed that, after reformulating the bipartition problem as a quadratic pseudoboolean program with a cardinality constraint and applying lagrangean relaxation, lower bounds significantly sharper than those used in Christofides and Brooker could be derived, resulting in improved tree search procedures.…”
Section: Previous Attempts At Solving (Gpp) and (Wgpp)mentioning
confidence: 99%